Virtual Library
Start Your Search
M. Kakihana
Author of
-
+
P2.07 - Poster Session 2 - Surgery (ID 190)
- Event: WCLC 2013
- Type: Poster Session
- Track: Surgery
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/29/2013, 09:30 - 16:30, Exhibit Hall, Ground Level
-
+
P2.07-029 - Clinical features and outcome of surgically resected secondary primary non-small cell lung cancer (ID 2607)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): M. Kakihana
- Abstract
Background
The incidence of a second primary lung cancer has been reported with 1-2% per patient year. Still, relatively few data has been published about this selected group of patients with sometimes conflicting results. Most data has been included low patient numbers that derived either from multiple institutions or from a long time period that may have rendered conclusions difficult caused by varying diagnostic procedures and therapeutic developments. Moreover, data regarding clinical characteristics is lacking for patients with first primary lung cancer who might be at risk for developing second primary lung cancerMethods
From January 1999 to December 2008, 65 patients with second primary lung cancer, classified by the criteria proposed by Martini and Melamed, were treated at our Institution. We had 34 patients with a synchronous tumour and 31 with metachronous. As second treatment, we performed 11 lobectomies and 54 segmentectomies and widewedge resections. Histology was adenocarcinoma in 58, squamous in 4, adenosquamous in 8, large cells in 2 and pleomorphic in 1.Results
Overall 5-year survival from second surgery was 69%; overall operative mortality was 0.65% (1 patient). Regarding the interval of surgery, the second operation had performed later than 2 years group showed a better 5-year survival than within 2 years group (80.6% and 69.2%, respectively, P = 0.008). Compared with lobectomies, segmentectomy showed a no significantly changes in survival rate(69 and 60%, respectively, P >0.051).Conclusion
From our experience, lobectomy should still be considered as the treatment of choice in the management of second primary lung cancer, but sublobar resection remains a valid option in high-risk patients with limited pulmonary function.