Virtual Library

 x 
My Library Virtual Library FAQ

Start Your Search

J. De Jong



Author of

  • +

    MO10 - Molecular Pathology II (ID 127)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Mini Oral Abstract Session
    • Track: Pathology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      MO10.07 - ALK immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in-situ hybridization in Lung adenocarcinomas from the ETOP Lungscape tumour cohort (ID 2267)

      16:50 - 16:55  |  Author(s): J. De Jong

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background
      The European Thoracic Oncology Platform LungScape database contains 2614 cases of primary resected lung carcinoma from 16 centres with patient demographics, pathological tumour data and detailed clinical follow-up. A total of 1281 cases of adenocarcinoma with >2 years clinical follow-up were selected for analysis of ALK status by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Test positive cases were matched, in order of importance at ratio 1:2, by stage, gender, smoking status, study centre, year of surgery and age with test negative cases -both for IHC and for FISH testing.

      Methods
      Testing was performed in all centres using the same protocol (IHC: Novocastra 5A4 clone antibody at 1:10 dilution, Novolink detection system. FISH: Abbott Vysis ALK break-apart probe). Each centre passed an external QA test using unknown cases in a tissue microarray before conducting the LungScape tumour testing. IHC was scored according to three intensity scores (1+, 2+, 3+) using ‘objective’ methodology previously described [1]. Maximum staining intensity was recorded. Any IHC staining was defined as IHC positive result. FISH preparations were assessed according to the Vysis protocol on all 82 IHCpositive cases plus their 164 IHCnegative matches.

      Results

      IHC cases, n=1281 FISH positive(264 tested)
      IHC negative 1199 (93.6%) 0 (0.0% of 164 controls) FISH specificity: 100%
      IHC 1+ 43 (3.35%) 2 (4.6% of IHC 1+)
      IHC 2+ 16 (1.25%) 6 (37.5% of IHC 2+)
      IHC 3+ 23 (1.8%) 20 (87% of IHC 3+)
      IHC any positive 82 (6.4%) 28 (34.1% of IHC+) FISH sensitivity: 34.1%
      FISH sensitivity was 87% for IHC 3+. IHCpositive/FISHnegative cases (n=54) were mostly IHC 1+ (75.9%), sometimes IHC 2+ (18.5%) and rarely IHC 3+ (5.5%). The frequency of never smokers was higher in the ALK IHCpositive group (29.3%) versus IHCnegative group (18.3%) {p=0.011}. Age, gender and tumour stage did not differ between IHC groups. The hazard of an event for IHCpositive cases decreases by 32% in relapse-free survival {RFS; p=0.03} and by 38% in either time-to-relapse {TTR; p=0.02} or overall survival {OS; p=0.016}. Multivariate models -adjusted for patient and tumour characteristics- indicated that IHC-ALK was a significant predictor for all three time-to-event outcomes (RFS, TTR, OS). In stratified Cox analysis, significantly higher OS was retained in the IHCpositive (HR=0.59, p=0.04) and FISHpositive (HR=0.34, p=0.03) cases in the matched cohorts, while conditional logistic regression yielded non-significant associations with 3-year survival status.

      Conclusion
      In this large cohort of surgically resected primary lung adenocarcinoma: ALK IHC positivity was 6.4%. IHC 3+ staining (prevalence 1.8%) showed 87% probability of ALK FISH positivity ALK IHC positivity was higher in never smokers and related to better clinical outcome ALK testing can be reliably implemented across multiple laboratories {1} Ruschoff et al. Virchows Arch. 2010;457(299-307).

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    P3.11 - Poster Session 3 - NSCLC Novel Therapies (ID 211)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P3.11-037 - A phase II study of sorafenib and metformin in patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a KRAS mutation (ID 2701)

      09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): J. De Jong

      • Abstract

      Background
      Previously we reported a phase II study of sorafenib, a multi tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in advanced NSCLC patients with a KRAS mutation [1]. While sorafenib was found active in this group of patients, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were disappointing. Concurrent inhibition of multiple pathways may improve treatment outcome. Metformin is a save and well known antidiabetic drug. It has been described that metformin has inhibitory effects against mTOR, downstream of PI3K. An in vitro study of our group has shown synergistic effects of sorafenib and metformin which provided the rationale for this study [2]. In a post hoc analysis of the previous study, metformin users appeared to be among the longest survivors.

      Methods
      Patients with advanced NSCLC with a KRAS mutation, pretreated with platinum containing chemotherapy were included. Other inclusion criteria were: ECOG performance score (PS) 0-1, adequate organ reserve, creatinine clearance >60 ml/min and provided written informed consent according to local IRB regulations. A tumor biopsy was mandatory to confirm the presence of a KRAS mutation, prior to start of treatment. Treatment consisted of sorafenib 400 mg BID and metformin 1000 mg BID until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Dose reductions and discontinuations were specified per protocol in the face of CTC toxicities grade 3 and 4. Primary endpoint: disease control rate (DCR) at 6 weeks according to RECIST version 1.1. Secondary endpoints: duration of response, progression free survival (PFS), overall survival and treatment related toxicities. A 2-stage design was implemented (Simon's optimal design; p0=50%, p1=70%, alpha=0.05, beta=0.20) for a total of 45 evaluable patients.

      Results
      Fifty-five patients were included between 1[st] of July 2012 and 1[st] of June 2013. Median age was 60 (range 34-77) years, 28 female (51 %), ECOG PS 0/1/2 16/32/1, all patients had stage IV disease. Of 47 patients disease evaluation after 6 weeks was available (Fig. 1). Two patients had a partial response, 23 stable disease and 22 patients had progressive disease. DCR was 53%. Results of secondary endpoints will be available at time of the conference.

      Conclusion
      This preliminary analysis suggests that the addition of metformin did not improve DCR, compared to previous reported results of sorafenib monotherapy in pretreated stage IV NSCLC patients with a KRAS mutation. [1] Dingemans AM et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Feb 1;19(3):743-51 [2] Groenendijk FH et al. EJC. 2012 Nov; 48 (suppl. 6): p 48 Figure 1