Virtual Library

 x 
My Library Virtual Library FAQ

Start Your Search

M. Liao



Author of

  • +

    MO08 - NSCLC - Early Stage (ID 117)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Mini Oral Abstract Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      MO08.05 - Research and progress of vascular targeted therapy in the postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for lung cancer (ID 732)

      16:35 - 16:40  |  Author(s): M. Liao

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background
      Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is extensively received due to its extension of the time to recurrence and enhancement of survival rate in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it has reached the plateau at current, the beneficial cases are few, and drug-resistance and over-treatment phenomena are present in most of patients, hence it is necessary to seek a new postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy to improve the survival rate. Angiogenesis is one premise of malignant tumors to occur, develop and metastasize, but vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is one of the most important tumors in the process of neovascularization. Under normal conditions, VEGF is hardly expressed in a lot of normal tissues in vivo, while highly expressed in the tumors like osteosarcoma, bladder cancer, breast cancer and colorectal cancer. Recombinant human endostatin (endostar) can significantly intervene the angiogenesis-promoting effect to block the nutritional supply of tumors and inhibit tumor proliferation or metastasis. We compare the curative effect of endostar plus adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy alone in the treatment of patients with completely resected NSCLC at stage IB-IIIA.

      Methods
      This is an open, multicenter, randomized (1:1) study, stratified by gender, stage and histology. Completely resected pts (stage IB to IIIA) were randomized to receive adjuvant NP plus Endostar (Vinorelbine 25mg/m2 on d1 and d8 plus Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on d1, and iv plus Endostar 7.5mg/m2 per day iv for consecutive 14 days. Every 21 days as one cycle for 4 cycles) or NP regimen alone. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints included tumor response rate, overall survival and safety.

      Results
      250 pts (1:1) were included between 07/2007 and 06/2009. Two arms were well-balanced with regard to age, gender, histology, staging, and resection type. The follow-up time is 42 months. The two groups had no significant difference in the incidence of toxicity reaction. Endostatin plus NP can prolong the DFS of patients with complete resectable NSCLC at stage IIIA (19.33±3.73m vs 17.10±9.68m) with high security, but no statistical difference. Cases with high expression of VEGF showed a better DFS than cases with low expression in Endostatin plus NP group (48.45±3.52m vs 40.18±4.54m, P < 0.05). The level of peripheral circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in NSCLC patients is significantly higher than that in healthy volunteers. EPCs level was associated with NSCLC stage. The EPCs levels after treatment significantly decreased than that before treatment (P=0.014) in beneficiaries of NP or NP plus with endostar. The time to progression (TTP) was longer in patients with lower levels of EPCs (<0.35%) before chemotherapy or endostatin treatment (P<0.001).

      Conclusion
      This preliminary result showed vascular targeted therapy in postoperative adjuvant therapy of lung cancer has a good application prospect. VEGF and EPCs play important roles in the development of lung cancer. Deep studies should be taken for the other related molecular targets in the future.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    P3.11 - Poster Session 3 - NSCLC Novel Therapies (ID 211)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P3.11-040 - Analysis of patient-reported outcomes from the LUME-Lung 1 trial: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study in second-line advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (ID 2812)

      09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): M. Liao

      • Abstract

      Background
      Nintedanib is an oral, twice-daily angiokinase inhibitor targeting VEGFR-1–3, PDGFR-α/β and FGFR-1–3. LUME-Lung 1 is a placebo-controlled phase III trial investigating nintedanib plus docetaxel in advanced NSCLC patients after failure of first-line chemotherapy.

      Methods
      Stage IIIB/IV or recurrent NSCLC patients were randomised to receive nintedanib 200 mg bid plus docetaxel 75 mg/m[2] q21d (n=655), or placebo plus docetaxel (n=659). The primary endpoint was centrally reviewed progression-free survival (PFS) analysed after 714 events; the key secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS) analysed hierarchically after 1121 events, first in adenocarcinoma patients and then all patients. Quality of Life (QoL) was included as a secondary endpoint. Lung cancer symptoms and health-related QoL were assessed every 21 days until the first follow-up visit using the EORTC (QLQ-C30/LC13) and EQ-5D questionnaires. Changes of ≥10 points as compared with baseline were considered clinically significant. Analyses of cough, dyspnoea and pain symptoms were prespecified. Time to deterioration (TTD, first 10-point worsening from baseline) was analysed using a stratified log-rank test. An exploratory analysis of all subscales/items from the EORTC QLQ-C30/LC13 questionnaires estimated the respective hazard ratios for TTD using a Cox proportional hazards model.

      Results
      LUME-Lung 1 showed that nintedanib in combination with docetaxel significantly prolonged PFS for all patients regardless of histology (3.4 vs 2.7 months; HR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.68–0.92; p=0.0019), with a trend for improved median OS (10.1 vs 9.1 months; HR 0.94, 95% CI: 0.83–1.05; p=0.272) and significantly improved OS in patients with adenocarcinoma (HR: 0.83; p=0.0359; median 10.3 to 12.6 months). The most common AEs were diarrhoea and reversible ALT elevations. With respect to the QoL assessment, there was a high compliance rate of >80% until treatment course 25 for QLQ-LC13 and QLQ-C30 in both treatment arms. The addition of nintedanib to docetaxel did not influence TTD for cough (HR 0.90; 95% CI: 0.77–1.05; p=0.1858), dyspnoea (HR 1.05; 95% CI: 0.91–1.20; p=0.5203) or pain (HR 0.95; 95% CI: 0.82–1.09; p=0.4373), and maintained global health status/QoL (HR 0.952; 95% CI: 0.83–1.10). There was a significant deterioration in scores for nausea and vomiting, appetite loss and diarrhoea. The results were similar for adenocarcinoma patients with respect to cough (HR 0.97; 95% CI: 0.78–1.20; p=0.7744), dyspnoea (HR 1.04; 95% CI: 0.86–1.26; p=0.6813) and pain (HR 0.93; 95% CI: 0.76–1.13; p=0.4785); however, there was a trend for improved global health status/QoL (HR 0.86; 95% CI: 0.71–1.05). For squamous cell carcinoma patients, there was a trend for delayed TTD for cough (HR 0.84; 95% CI: 0.66–1.07; p=0.1561) and a maintained global health status/QoL (HR 0.975; 95% CI: 0.788–1.206). Further analyses are ongoing and will be presented at the congress.

      Conclusion
      In second-line NSCLC patients, docetaxel plus nintedanib did not result in any significant improvements in cough, dyspnoea or pain compared with placebo and docetaxel. However, PFS was improved in patients of all histologies receiving docetaxel and nintedanib, and OS was improved in patients with adenocarcinoma histology without adversely affecting self-reported QoL.