Virtual Library

 x 
My Library Virtual Library FAQ

Start Your Search

A. Bizieux-Thaminy



Author of

  • +

    MO07 - NSCLC - Targeted Therapies II (ID 114)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Mini Oral Abstract Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      MO07.09 - Feasibility and clinical impact of re-biopsy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective multicentric study in real world setting (GFPC study 12-01) (ID 1045)

      17:00 - 17:05  |  Author(s): A. Bizieux-Thaminy

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background
      In case of progression under initial treatment, repeat biopsy is a new option procedure in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Its justification is based on the assessment of biological markers (comparison to the initial status, emergence of resistance to chemotherapy or new biomarkers). The aim of this pragmatic prospective multicenter study was to assess feasibility and clinical utility of re-biopsy in real world setting in advanced NSCLC.

      Methods
      Patient’s main inclusion criteria was advanced NSCLC with an indication of repeat biopsy by the referent clinician. The primary outcome was the percentage of successful procedures; secondary outcomes were localization of the new biopsy, type of procedure, new biological status (comparison to initial status, new biomarkers, resistance biomarkers) and tolerance of the procedure.

      Results
      From May 2012 to May 2013, 18 centers included 102 patients. The characteristics of the 67 first patients were: male: 40%; age: 64.8 ± 10.9 years; PS 0/1: 87%; adenocarcinoma: 85%; EGFR mutated: 46.2%; no biological available assessment: 16.4%; controlled disease as best response to first line: 70%. Repeat biopsy was possible in 80.6%. The main failure reasons were: inaccessible lesion: 4.5%, medical contraindications: 14.9%. Main procedures were: bronchial endoscopy: 48.1%, trans thoracic needle biopsy: 24.1%. The procedure permits to find, in EGFR wild type population, 3 patients with a driver oncogene (1 HER2, 1 Ros1, 1 EML4 ALK); in EGFR mutated patients, 2 T790M mutations and to obtain in 3 patients with no biological data’s at the diagnosis, a biological profile. Complications were very low: 2 cases of moderate bleeding and 1 case of pneumothorax.

      Conclusion
      Repeat biopsy is a feasible procedure with acceptable adverse events. Recommendations should be realized on the indications of re-biopsy, the timing and the recommended site (primary versus metastasis, progressive target versus no progressive). Analysis of the complete population (n=102) will be presented at the meeting. Supported by an academic grant from Boehringer Ingelheim Company and Hoffmann-La Roche Company.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    P2.10 - Poster Session 2 - Chemotherapy (ID 207)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P2.10-013 - Randomized non comparative multicenter phase II study of sequential erlotinib with docetaxel versus docetaxel alone in patients with non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after failure of first line chemotherapy (TARSEQ): a GFPC 10.02 study. (ID 972)

      09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): A. Bizieux-Thaminy

      • Abstract

      Background
      Erlotinib and docetaxel are approved in second line treatment of advanced NSCLC. Concomitant administration of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKi) of EGFR with standard chemotherapy in first line did not improve survival compared to chemotherapy alone. Preliminary studies support a possible efficacy of sequential administration of EGFR TKi and chemotherapy. Objective: This open randomized phase II trial (Tarseq) was designed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of second-line sequential erlotinib plus docetaxel in advanced NSCLC.

      Methods
      Patients were randomized (1/1, stratified by center, disease status: recurrent or refractory (no response observed after 4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy))between sequential erlotinib 150 mg/d (day 2-16) + docetaxel (75 mg /m2 d1- 21) (arm A) versus docetaxel (75mg/m2 d1) alone (arm B) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was the rate of patients with progression-free survival at 15 weeks (PFS15) ; second endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and tolerability. Main eligibility criteria were advanced NSCLC, EGFR wild type or unknown, performance status 0 to 2, failure of first line cisplatin based chemotherapy; main exclusion criteria were more than 2 lines of treatment, previous anti-EGFR or docetaxel treatment. Statistical analysis was based on a Simon’s optimal two stage design . The primary endpoint is rejected if the number of efficacy is less 33 over 66 pts (25+ 41) at the end of the two stages.

      Results
      147 patients were randomized by 33 centers: median age: 60 ± 8 years, PS 0/1/2 (44/83/20 pts) ; male: 78%, EGFR status: wild type 66%, unknown: 34%; recurrent patients: 65% (arms A/B :66%/65%), nonsquamous: 86% (arms A/B : 84%/90%), smoking status: smokers 35%, formers 57,5%, never 7,5%. Baseline characteristics were balanced between 2 arms. In ITT, the primary objective was not meet with 18/66 pts without progression at 15 weeks in arm A, 17 /66 pts in arm B. In arm A and B, median PFS was 2,2 (CI95% 1,6-2,8) and 2,5 (CI 95% 1,7-2,8) months and median OS was 6,6 (CI 95% 4,3-10,3) and 8,4 (CI 95% 4,5-11,3) months respectively. Toxicity was acceptable in both arms with 60.2 % and 54% of G3/4 toxicity in arms A and B, respectively.

      Conclusion
      The sequential combination of erlotinib with docetaxel did not demonstrate any benefit in second-line treatment of EGFR wild type or unknown advanced NSCLC, despite acceptable toxicity. The Pharmacological hypothesis of synergism between erlotinib given sequentially and standard chemotherapy is not confirmed in the present study. Clinical trial information: NCT01350817 / Supported by an academic grant from Roche, Chugai, Sanofi Aventis,with the help of clinical research direction ( Limoges University Hospital)

  • +

    P2.24 - Poster Session 2 - Supportive Care (ID 157)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Supportive Care
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P2.24-039 - Renal failure is the first cause of double maintenance (bevacizumab + pemetrexed) discontinuation for toxicity in real world setting (ID 2491)

      09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): A. Bizieux-Thaminy

      • Abstract

      Background
      Maintenance treatment, with either bevacizumab or pemetrexed, has been shown to increase PFS and overall survival. Two trials have compared double maintenance (DM) therapy (pemetrexed + bevacizumab), to single drug maintenance (bevacizumab in AVAPERL and POINTBREAK studies). Conflicting results were found. Before definitive conclusions can be driven from these studies and other ongoing study (ECOG 5508), the purpose of our retrospective study was to determine in real world setting the frequency of double maintenance discontinuation for adverse event, and to describe the main toxicities occurring during double maintenance.

      Methods
      All patients who received at least one cycle of pemetrexed and bevacizumab as maintenance treatment were identified from the Oncology Pharmacy database of participating centers since year 2011. All the charts were analyzed retrospectively to obtain clinical data. Lab results were noted for haemoglobin, creatinine and liver enzymes before starting and after receiving multiple doses of pemetrexed and bevacizumab.

      Results
      Included were 87 patients treated with two to six cycles of induction chemotherapy (median 4), combining platinum with pemetrexed and bevacizumab, followed by at least one cycle of bevacizumab and pemetrexed as maintenance treatment. All patients received supplementation of vitamin B12 and folic acid during chemotherapy. Baselines characteristics (%): male 54: stage IV 96,5; adenocarcinoma 96,5; median age 58 yr. 57,8% of patients had objective response after induction chemotherapy, and 42,2% had stable disease after induction chemotherapy. At cut off date: treatment was still ongoing for 17 patients (19,8%); 40,6% of patients stopped DM for progressive disease; 33,3% of patients stopped DM for toxicity (out of these 33% of patients, 42% went on single maintenance with Pemetrexed and 58% with Bevacizumab); 11,6% of patients stopped DM for patient/physician decision, and 14,4% for other reasons. The most common toxicity responsible for DM discontinuation was renal failure (52%).

      Reason for discontinuation (%) POINTBREAK AVAPERL This study
      Progressive disease 61,0 54,7 40,6
      Adverse event 13,7 21,6 33,3
      Others reasons 19,8 23,5 25,8

      Conclusion
      This retrospective study suggests that in real world setting, double maintenance is frequently discontinued for adverse event (33,3% of patients). The most frequent adverse event was renal failure (half of the cases). Further analyses are ongoing in order to identify any predictive factors for renal failure occurrence and will be presented at meeting. These results suggest that particular caution should be taken in order to preserve renal function whenever double maintenance (pemetrexed + bevacizumab) is considered in a patient with stable or responding tumour after induction chemotherapy consisting in platinum, pemetrexed and bevacizumab.