Virtual Library

 x 
My Library Virtual Library FAQ

Start Your Search

C.J. Langer

Moderator of

  • +

    O02 - NSCLC - Combined Modality Therapy I (ID 111)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Oral Abstract Session
    • Track: Combined Modality
    • Presentations: 8
    • +

      O02.01 - Geographic differences in the combined-modality treatment of stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer: Results from a global phase III trial of tecemotide (L-BLP25) (ID 2712)

      10:30 - 10:40  |  Author(s): N. Thatcher, F.A. Shepherd, P. Mitchell, M.A. Socinski, A. Paredes, M. Lambrechts, M. Thomas, J. Kollmeier, M. Zemanova, P. Sadjadian, N. Peylan-Ramu, C. Helwig, A. Schröder, C.A. Butts

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background
      Chemo-radiotherapy (chemo/RT) is the standard of care for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but little is known about differences in clinical practice between regions of the world. The START trial is a global phase III trial of the MUC1-specific cancer immunotherapy tecemotide (L-BLP25), for which key efficacy and safety results have been reported previously. Here we report regional differences in diagnostic procedures and treatment of stage III NSCLC prior to enrolment in START.

      Methods
      The START trial recruited patients (performance status 0/1) with unresectable stage III NSCLC who had not progressed within 28–84 days of completing ≥2 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy with concurrent or sequential radiotherapy (≥50 Gy). Baseline characteristics, diagnostic procedures and the initial chemo/RT administered of those recruited were compared between centers in different regions.

      Results
      From Jan 2007 to Nov 2011, 1513 patients were recruited at >250 centers in 33 countries: Western Europe 40.3%, Eastern Europe 26.0%, North America 21.8%, Latin America 5.7%, Asia 3.4%, Australia 2.8%. The majority of patients (92.1%) were Caucasian and median age was 61 years. Overall, 6.3% of patients were never-smokers with little inter-regional variation except for Asia (31.4%). The proportion of current smokers upon entry into the trial was highest in Eastern Europe (36.3%) and lowest in Australia (11.6%). Median tobacco consumption by region ranged from 36.2 (Eastern Europe) to 53.6 (Latin America) pack-years. The proportion of patients considered for the START trial who received concurrent rather than sequential chemo/RT varied widely between regions and was highest in North America and Australia, lower in Western Europe, Latin America and Asia, and lowest in Eastern Europe. There were also substantial variations in the diagnostic procedures between the regions, although pathological confirmation of N-status was infrequent in all regions. Detailed results by region for the time from diagnosis to randomization, duration of chemo- and radiotherapy, and chemotherapy agents used will be presented.

      Proportion of patients (%) with:
      Use of concurrent chemo/RT N-status determined with PET or PET/CT N-status determined with mediastinoscopy
      Australia (n=43) 100 74.4 2.3
      North America (n=330) 92.7 37.9 18.5
      Asia (n=51) 66.7 21.5 2.0
      Latin America (n=86) 65.1 7.0 5.8
      Western Europe (n=609) 67.2 32.2 6.9
      Eastern Europe (n=394) 28.9 7.3 3.6

      Conclusion
      Baseline data from the START trial suggest substantial variations in the management of unresectable stage III NSCLC between different regions of the world. While recruited patients from North American and Australian centers mostly received concurrent chemo/RT in accordance with current recommendations, a substantial proportion of patients in Europe, Latin America and Asia received sequential chemo/RT. More frequent use of concurrent chemo/RT as the recommended standard of care should be made across geographic regions.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      O02.02 - Tecemotide (L-BLP25) in unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer in the phase III START study: Further endpoint and exploratory biomarker results (ID 2779)

      10:40 - 10:50  |  Author(s): P.L. Mitchell, C.A. Butts, M.A. Socinski, N. Thatcher, G. Wickart-Johansson, P.M. Ellis, O. Gladkov, J.R. Pereira, W.E.E. Eberhardt, K. Horwood, A. Szczesna, C. Helwig, A. Schröder, F.A. Shepherd

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background
      The phase III START study evaluated the mucin 1 (MUC1) antigen-specific cancer immunotherapy tecemotide (L-BLP25) vs. placebo in patients with stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who did not progress following initial chemo-radiotherapy (chemo/RT). The primary objective of overall survival (OS) prolongation was not met, however, pre-defined subgroup analyses revealed a clinically meaningful prolongation of survival with tecemotide in patients previously treated with concurrent chemo/RT (p=0.016). Sensitivity analyses suggested the observed treatment effect may have been under-estimated due to a clinical hold, which resulted in a median suspension of recruitment and investigational treatment of about 4.4 months. Tecemotide was well tolerated and no safety concerns were identified.

      Methods
      From January 2007 to November 2011, 1513 patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC and stable disease or objective response following initial chemo/RT were randomized (2:1, double-blind) to subcutaneous tecemotide (806 µg lipopeptide) or placebo, weekly for 8 weeks and then 6-weekly until disease progression or withdrawal. A single dose of cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2) or saline was given 3 days prior to first tecemotide/placebo dose. Primary endpoint, OS, and secondary endpoints progression-free-survival (PFS) and time-to-treatment-failure (TTF) used a Cox proportional hazards regression model adjusting for randomization strata. While RECIST 1.0 had to be observed for determination of disease progression, there was no formal imaging schedule to determine disease progression; this was done according to institutional practice. Exploratory analyses were done for treatment interaction for HLA-A02, -DRB4 and -B08. Baseline peripheral blood anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), serum MUC1 (sMUC1), lymphocyte count and neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio (NLR) currently are being explored.

      Results
      The primary analysis population (N=1239) was defined prospectively to account for the clinical hold and prospectively excluded 274 patients randomized within 6 months prior to onset of the hold. Median PFS was 9.6 months with tecemotide vs. 7.7 months with placebo (HR 0.865, 95%CI 0.755–0.990, p=0.036). In keeping with OS data, tecemotide treatment effects on PFS were more pronounced in patients treated with concurrent chemo/RT (N=806; HR 0.826, 95%CI 0.696–0.980, p=0.029) vs. sequential chemo/RT (N=433; HR 0.947, 95%CI 0.756–1.187, p=0.638). Median TTF was 8.9 months with tecemotide vs. 7.2 months with placebo (HR 0.887, 95%CI 0.777–1.012, p=0.075). A prolongation of TTF with tecemotide was seen in patients with prior concurrent chemo/RT (HR 0.844, 95%CI 0.715–0.996, p=0.045), which was absent in the subgroup with prior sequential chemo/RT (HR 0.977, 95%CI 0.784–1.217, p=0.835). Detailed biomarker results will be presented.

      Conclusion
      While the primary endpoint of prolongation of OS was not met, secondary endpoints PFS and TTF support the previously-reported finding of a more favorable effect of tecemotide in patients treated with concurrent but not sequential chemo/RT. Any potential further clinical investigation of tecemotide in locally advanced NSCLC should focus on patients following concurrent chemo/RT therapy.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      O02.03 - Value of Adding Erlotinib to Thoracic Radiation Therapy with Chemotherapy for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective Phase II Study (ID 2436)

      10:50 - 11:00  |  Author(s): R. Komaki, P. Allen, X. Wei, G. Blumenschein, X.M. Tang, J..L.J. Lee, J.W. Welsh, I.I. Wistuba, D.D. Liu, W.K. Hong

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background
      The molecular basis for radiation resistance seems to involve an enhanced survival response with increased capacity for DNA repair and suppressed apoptosis. Both properties are controlled in part by upstream signal transduction pathways triggered by activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Hypothesizing that the response of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to current standard chemoradiotherapy can be improved through the addition of therapy targeted to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), we undertook a single-institution phase II trial to test whether adding the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) erlotinib to concurrent chemoradiation therapy for previously untreated, locally advanced, inoperable NSCLC would improve survival and response rates without increasing toxicity.

      Methods
      Forty-eight patients with previously untreated NSCLC received radiation (63 Gy/35 fractions) on Monday‒Friday, with chemotherapy (paclitaxel 45 mg/m², carboplatin AUC=2) given every Monday and erlotinib (150 mg orally 1/d) Tuesday–Sunday for 7 weeks, followed by two cycles of consolidation paclitaxel-carboplatin. The primary endpoint was time to progression; secondary endpoints were toxicity; response, overall survival (OS), and disease control rates; and whether any endpoint differed by EGFR mutation status.

      Results
      Of 46 patients (96%) evaluable for response, 40 were former or never smokers; 23 had adenocarcinoma; and 41 were evaluable for EGFR mutations (37 wild-type [wt] and 4 mutations [all adenocarcinomas]). Median time to progression was 14.5 months and did not differ according to EGFR status. Toxicity was acceptable (no grade 5, one grade 4, and eleven grade 3). Fourteen patients (31%) had complete responses (3 mutations and 11 wt), 24 (52%) partial (20 wt and 4 unknown EGFR mutation status), and 8 (18%) had stable or progressive disease (6 wt, 1 mutation and 1 unknown EGFR mutation status); 3 patients with mutations (75%) had complete response vs. 11 wt (30%) (p=0.07 for EGFR mutation vs wt groups). For alive patients, the median follow-up was 44.7 months’ follow-up (range, 29.3–54.6 months). OS rates were 82.6% at 1 year, 67.4% at 2 years, 48.5% at 3 years, and 32.2% at 4 years and did not differ by mutation status (wt vs mutation, p=0.17). For all patients the median follow-up was 30.6 months’ follow-up (range, 3.4–54.6 months). 14 patients were free from progression and 32 had local failure, distant failure, or both. Eleven of the 27 distant failures were in the brain (7 wt, 3 mutation, 1 unknown; P=0.04); the local control rate was 75% among the 4 patients with EGFR mutations. Median time to progression was 13.6 months (95% confidence interval 10.2-20) and did not differ by EGFR status (wt vs mutation p=0.39).

      Conclusion
      Overall survival was promising, but time to progression was disappointing. Toxicity was acceptable. The prevalence of distant failures underscores the need for more effective systemic therapy, perhaps including maintenance EGFR-TKI for patients with mutated EGFR.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      O02.04 - DISCUSSANT (ID 3945)

      11:00 - 11:15  |  Author(s): E. Vokes

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Abstract not provided

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      O02.05 - Major pathologic response (≤10% viable tumor) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a surrogate for overall survival in patients with pathologically documented stage IIIA (N2) lung adenocarcinomas (ID 2345)

      11:15 - 11:25  |  Author(s): J.E. Chaft, M.D. Hellmann, V.W. Rusch, W.D. Travis, M.G. Kris

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background
      Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves overall survival in patients with resectable stage IIIA lung adenocarcinomas. The gold-standard endpoint for clinical trials evaluating curative therapies is overall survival. Unfortunately, these trials take nearly a decade to complete and this prolonged timeline hinders the approval of promising therapies in the curative realm. Alternative endpoints that can act as a surrogate for overall survival have been evaluated, including nodal downstaging, nodal clearance, and pathologic response. We evaluated the degree to which these endpoints associate with overall survival in patients with pathologically proven stage IIIA(N2) lung adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

      Methods
      An electronic database search engine was used to identify all patients with resectable stage IIIA(N2) lung adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between 1/2007-8/2012. Nodal downstaging was defined as no residual tumor tissue in the N2 nodes. Nodal clearance was defined as no residual tumor tissue in N1 and N2 nodes. Pathologic response was systemically assessed by a dedicated thoracic pathologist (WDT) who reviewed at least 1 section per centimeter of greatest gross tumor diameter. The percent viable tumor tissue in each slide was estimated to the nearest 10%. Major pathologic response (MPR) was defined as ≤10% viable tumor tissue. All pathologic analyses were performed by a dedicated thoracic pathologist (WDT). Patients with residual N2 disease at resection were offered post-operative radiation and routinely monitored thereafter. Survival proportions were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.

      Results
      69 patients with pathologically confirmed IIIA(N2) disease were identified and 46 (67%) ultimately underwent R0 resection. Among these patients, 16 had nodal downstaging, 14 had nodal clearance and 5 had a MPR. In both intention to treat analyses (N=69) and including only those who underwent resection, only MPR significantly associated with overall survival. The table below details findings from the population who had complete cancer resection.

      Endpoint (N=46) Yes (A) No (B) NA (C) HR (95% CI) ITT (A vs B+C) HR (95% CI) Resected(A vs B)
      Nodal downstaging 16 30 23 0.68 (0.32-1.56) 0.73 (0.24-2.10)
      Nodal clearance 14 32 23 0.57 (0.27-1.36) 0.96 (0.32-2.81)
      MPR 5 41 23 0.28 (0.1-0.78) 0.26 (0.07-0.95)
      NA = not assessable; ITT = intention to treat

      Conclusion
      MPR (≤10% viable tumor) effectively identifies patients with good clinical outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and can serve as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival. Furthermore, lack of MPR identifies a patient population at high risk of recurrence. Neither nodal downstaging nor nodal clearance effectively discriminated those with improved survival. Adaptive clinical trials designed to target those not achieving MPR are encouraged in attempt to improve the rate of cure in this disease.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      O02.06 - Predictors of trimodality therapy use and overall survival in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the National Cancer Database (ID 1736)

      11:25 - 11:35  |  Author(s): M.J. Fidler, M. Liptay, P. Bonomi, D. Sher

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background
      The optimal locoregional therapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer is controversial, with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and trimodality therapy (chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery, TMT) serving as competing strategies. The implementation of TMT and resultant survival outcomes in routine United States clinical practice has not been closely examined. In this study, we used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to determine predictors of TMT and compare overall survival (OS) among a large cohort of stage III NSCLC patients treated with CRT or TMT.

      Methods
      Patients included were stage III NSCLC patients who received concurrent CRT with or without subsequent surgical resection at Commission on Cancer-accredited programs between 1998 and 2010; survival data were available for patients treated through 2005. High-volume (HV) center was defined as the upper decile. Per NCDB coding, treatment centers were stratified into academic, comprehensive, and non-comprehensive community cancer center (CCC). Logistic regression was used for univariable analyses, and multivariable models were prepared using stepwise selection to determine demographic, clinical and non-clinical predictors of TMT use and overall survival. Propensity score matching was used to estimate treatment effect and to minimize the effect of confounding variables.

      Results
      The overall cohort consisted of 49,534 patients, 25,679 of whom also had available survival data. Trimodality therapy was delivered in 7.8% of patients. Multivariable clinical predictors of TMT included: white race (OR 1.36), younger age (lowest [LQ] vs highest [HQ] quartile, OR 4.31), high school education or higher (HQ vs LQ, OR 1.37), stage IIIA vs IIIB, (OR 3.02) and squamous histology (OR 1.26). Non-clinical variables associated with TMT included: early treatment era (first vs last 3 years, OR 1.30), private insurance (OR 1.53), increasing distance from the treatment center (HQ vs LQ, OR 1.81), geography (Northeast vs. other, OR 1.35), treatment at academic research programs (ARP) over comprehensive CCC or non-comprehensive CCC (OR 1.53 and 2.01, respectively), and HV institution (OR 1.26). The median, 3- and 5-year OS were 12.3 months, 17% and 9.6%, respectively. Univariable comparison between CRT and TMT showed OS benefit with TMT (median 26.1 vs 11.7 months, log rank p<0.001). On MVA, stage IIIA (hazard ratio, HR, 0.85), squamous histology (HR 0.97), young age (HR 0.74) , female gender (HR 0.86), non-white race (HR 0.90), higher income (HQ vs LQ HR 0.76), farther distance from treatment center (HR 0.93), more recent treatment era (HR 0.80 vs. first 2 time periods) and TMT (HR 0.49) were significantly associated with improved OS. ARP was significantly associated with superior OS (HR 0.92 vs. CCP) if TMT was not in the Cox model. After propensity matching, TMT was still associated with improved OS (HR 0.62, p<0.001).

      Conclusion
      The use of TMT was strongly associated with markers of higher socioeconomic status and treatment at high-volume and academic centers. These data further support a significant survival benefit in patients undergoing TMT, and treatment at academic centers may improve OS via increased use of TMT.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      O02.07 - Is there a survival benefit in patients with stage IIIA(N2) non-small cell lung cancer under neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy followed by surgery administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis (ID 2164)

      11:35 - 11:45  |  Author(s): Y. Xu, B. Li, X. Xu, X. Yu, Q. Chen, W. Mao

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background
      Optimal management of clinical stage IIIA (N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is controversial despite the conduct of several randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This article contributes to this problem by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of published RCTs.

      Methods
      A comprehensive literature search was performed in the Pubmed, Embase, Medline database (last search updated in May 2013) for relevant studies comparing patients with stage IIIA (N2)NSCLC undergoing surgery alone, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy alone, or resection after neoadjuvant treatment with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. A systematic review and meta-analysis of available data were conducted using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) standards.

      Results
      The comparison contained two components. In the comparison of neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery and radical chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy, a fine homogeneity (χ[2]=2.26, p=0.52, I[2]=0.0%) between four studies with a total of 803 selected cases was detected between the overall survival (OS), and the combined hazard ratio (HR) was 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81-1.10; p=0.47). Progression-free survival (PFS) was investigated in two studies and there was also no significant difference for the combined HR was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.77-1.05; p=0.19). In the comparison of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (Neo-ChRT) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy(Neo-ChT) alone, three studies with a total of 229 selected cases were detected, with the combined HR of OS and PFS 0.79 (95% CI: 0.57–1.09; p=0.15) and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.39-1.15; p=0.15) respectively, but it did not reach the statistical significance. Observing the short-term therapeutic effect, these studies revealed that Neo-ChRT had increased the rate of mediastinal pCR by 15.48% (OR: 3.61, 95%CI: 1.07–12.15; P = 0.04). Comparing the incidence of main complications and mortality, there was no significant difference between neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery and radical chemoradiotherapy /radiotherapy alone. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery achievered higher response rates and similar postoperative mortality as compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by operation, without adding significant adverse events.Figure 1

      Conclusion
      Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy followed by surgery is not superior to that followed by definitive radiotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy dose not improve survival compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. But it can increase the rate of downstaging and mediastinal pCR which were correlated with the better PFS and OS. Neoadjuvant treatment has not increased the incidence of postoperative complication and motality. Further studies should be conducted to determine the patients who will benefit from various administrations.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      O02.08 - DISCUSSANT (ID 3946)

      11:45 - 12:00  |  Author(s): E. Vallieres

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Abstract not provided

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.



Author of

  • +

    MO06 - NSCLC - Chemotherapy I (ID 108)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Mini Oral Abstract Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      MO06.12 - Efficacy and safety of paclitaxel and carboplatin with bevacizumab for the first-line treatment of patients with nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): analyses based on age in the phase 3 PointBreak and E4599 trials (ID 2879)

      17:20 - 17:25  |  Author(s): C.J. Langer

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background
      A post hoc analysis of NSCLC patients (pts) aged ≥70 y in the pivotal E4599 trial found increased adverse events (AEs) and numerically decreased overall survival (OS) benefit associated with bevacizumab (BEV) compared with pts <70 y. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of BEV by age in pts in a pooled dataset from the E4599 and PointBreak (PB) trials.

      Methods
      Pts randomized to the PC (paclitaxel and carboplatin ) + BEV arms of E4599 and PB received P 200 mg/m[2], C AUC 6, and BEV 15 mg/kg q3w for 6 (E4599) or 4 (PB) cycles; Eligible pts received maintenance BEV alone q3w until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. OS, progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety were assessed in pts grouped according to age (<65 y, 65–74 y, 70–74 y, <75 y, and ≥75 y). Pt-level data from the PC + BEV arms of E4599 and PB were pooled and compared with data from pts in the PC-alone arm of E4599.

      Results
      PB and E4599 randomized 467 pts and 434 pts to PC + BEV, respectively, while 444 were randomized to receive PC alone on E4599. Baseline characteristics were balanced between age groups. OS and PFS hazard ratios (HRs) and increases in grade ≥3 AEs for the pooled pt cohort relative to E4599 PC-alone arm are shown (Table). Outcomes were similar in pts <70 y and ≥70 y, and data from the pooled population were similar to those seen in each individual trial (data not shown). ORR for pts <75 y was 39% with PC + BEV vs 26% with PC (P<.01). For pts ≥75 y, ORR was 33% vs 30% (P=.71). DCR in pts <75 y was 70% with PC + BEV vs 53% with PC (P<.01). For pts ≥75 y, DCR was 60% vs 67% (P=.37).

      Conclusion
      In a pooled exploratory analysis of pt data from E4599 and PB, the statistically significant benefit associated with the addition of BEV to PC appeared consistent across all age groups <75y, while pts ≥75 y receiving PC + BEV had no statistically significant survival benefit. Pts receiving PC + BEV had an increase in grade ≥3 AEs compared with pts receiving PC-alone in all age groups.

      PB + E4599 <65 y n=735 65–74 y n=453 70–74 y n=203 <75 y n=1188 ≥75 y n=157
      HR for OS 95% CI P 0.75 0.62–0.89 <.01 0.80 0.64–1.00 .05 0.68 0.48–0.96 .03 0.78 0.68–0.89 <.01 1.05 0.70–1.57 .83
      HR for PFS 95% CI P 0.71 0.60–0.85 <.01 0.62 0.49–0.78 <.01 0.68 0.48–0.96 .03 0.69 0.60–0.79 <.01 0.95 0.62–1.44 .80
      E4599 n=499 n=277 n=129 n=776 n=102
      Δ Grade ≥3 AEs,[a ]% P 13 <.01 21 <.01 23 <.01 15 <.01 25 <.01
      [a]Relative to PC-alone arm.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    MO07 - NSCLC - Targeted Therapies II (ID 114)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Mini Oral Abstract Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      MO07.06 - Updated results of a first-in-human dose-finding study of the ALK/EGFR inhibitor AP26113 in patients with advanced malignancies (ID 2400)

      16:45 - 16:50  |  Author(s): C.J. Langer

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background
      AP26113 is a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that exhibits pan-ALK inhibitory activity against all 9 clinically-identified crizotinib-resistant mutants, including the L1196M gatekeeper, in preclinical experiments. AP26113 also inhibits ROS1 and selectively inhibits mutant EGFR (EGFRm) in preclinical experiments, including the T790M resistance mutation, without affecting the native receptor.

      Methods
      We report data from the dose finding component (3+3 design) of a phase 1/2 open-label, multicenter study in patients with advanced malignancies (except leukemia) refractory to available therapies or for whom no standard treatment exists. Dosing was once daily (QD) or twice daily.

      Results
      As of 17 April 2013, 55 patients were enrolled: 30mg (daily dose) n=3, 60mg n=3, 90mg n=8, 120 mg n=15, 180mg n=15, 240mg n=9, 300mg n=2; 62% female, median age 58 yrs; diagnoses: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, n=47), other (n=8). 33 patients discontinued: 22 disease progression, 6 adverse event (AE), 4 deaths (2 possibly related: sudden death, hypoxia), 1 withdrawal by subject. The most common AEs included fatigue (40%), nausea (36%), and diarrhea (33%), which were generally grade 1/2 in severity. The most common grade 3/4 AE was pneumonia (5%). Two patients experienced dose limiting toxicities: grade 3 ALT increase in 1 patient (240mg QD); grade 4 dyspnea and grade 3 hypoxia in 1 patient (300mg QD). Twenty-eight patients had ALK+ history (24 NSCLC, 4 other). Among 24 evaluable ALK+ patients, 15 responded. Responses were observed in 2/4 (50%) ALK+ TKI-naïve patients and 13/17 (76%) ALK+ patients with prior crizotinib therapy and no other ALK inhibitor exposure. Among ALK+ NSCLC patients with prior crizotinib only, 12/16 (75%) responded. The longest response is 40+ weeks (ongoing). 4 of 5 ALK+ patients with untreated or progressing CNS lesions at baseline and with follow-up scans had evidence of radiographic improvement in CNS, including 1 patient resistant to crizotinib and LDK378 (overall response = stable disease). CNS lesion improvements in all 4 patients are ongoing, with durations ranging from 15+ to 28+ weeks. Twenty patients had EGFRm history (19 NSCLC, 1 SCLC); 18 had ≥1 prior EGFR TKI. Of 18 evaluable EGFRm patients, 1 patient (prior erlotinib) responded at 120mg QD (duration 26+ weeks, ongoing), 7 patients had stable disease, including 4 with T790M by history (1 ongoing at 240mg QD, duration 16+ weeks). The maximum tolerated dose has not been defined; however, based on safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics, the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) is 180mg QD. Updated data will be presented.

      Conclusion
      AP26113 has promising anti-tumor activity in patients with ALK+ NSCLC and other ALK+ tumors, with initial evidence of activity in EGFRm patients, and is generally well tolerated. Five phase 2 cohorts are enrolling at the RP2D (180mg QD): 1) ALK inhibitor-naïve ALK+ NSCLC, 2) crizotinib-resistant ALK+ NSCLC, 3) single EGFR TKI-resistant NSCLC with documented T790M, 4) other tumors with AP26113 targets, 5) crizotinib-naïve or –resistant ALK+ NSCLC with active CNS metastases. Further phase 1 testing at 240mg QD will occur in EGFRm patients with documented T790M. NCT01449461

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    MO24 - NSCLC - Chemotherapy III (ID 110)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Mini Oral Abstract Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      MO24.05 - DISCUSSANT (ID 3942)

      10:50 - 11:00  |  Author(s): C.J. Langer

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Abstract not provided

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    P2.10 - Poster Session 2 - Chemotherapy (ID 207)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P2.10-036 - Overall Survival and Hospitalization Rates in Medicare Patients Diagnosed with Advanced NSCLC Treated With Bevacizumab- Paclitaxel-Carboplatin vs Paclitaxel-Carboplatin: A Retrospective Cohort Study (ID 2419)

      09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): C.J. Langer

      • Abstract

      Background
      The study aimed to compare overall survival and hospitalization rates for Medicare patients diagnosed with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and treated with first-line bevacizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel (BCP) vs. carboplatin-paclitaxel (CP).

      Methods
      Patients aged ≥65years first diagnosed with nonsquamous NSCLC stage IIIB/ IV between 2006 and 2009 and treated with first-line BCP or CP therapy were identified in the SEER-Medicare database that links cancer registry and Medicare claims data from United States. Outcomes were measured from the treatment initiation date to the end of data availability on 12/31/2010 for hospitalizations and 12/31/2011 for survival. Survival and hospitalization rates are reported from Kaplan-Meier analyses over the follow-up period. Bootstrap methodology was used to test treatment groups differences in median time to death and first hospitalization. Age-stratified survival analyses were conducted using age 75 as a cut point. Inpatient utilization rates are also reported per 100 patient-days for each treatment group and compared in terms of incidence rate ratios (IRR) estimated from negative binomial models adjusted for potential confounders.

      Results
      Of 1,706 patients, 592 (34.7%) received BCP and 1,114 (65.3%) received CP by inclusion criteria, while 692 (40.6%) were ≥75 years of age. Patient characteristics were balanced between arms for age, sex, disease stage. The BCP group had fewer pre-treatment comorbidities, greater proportion of adenocarcinoma histology, and differences in ethnicity, SEER region, and income compared to the CP group. The median survival time was 10.5 months in the BCP group vs. 8.4 months in the CP group (2.1 months difference, p=0.0007). The difference in median overall survival favoring BCP over CP groups was 1.3 months for patients aged 65-74 years (p=0.11), and 3.3 months for those aged ≥75years (p=0.006). At 6-months and 1 year of follow-up, survival rates for all subjects were, respectively, 70.3% and 43.8% of BCP patients vs. 60.6% and 37.0% of CP patients. After 1 year of follow-up, 69.5% of BCP vs. 75.1% of CP had ≥ 1 hospital admission. Hospitalization rates were significantly lower for BCP patients (adjusted IRRs: 0.82, p=0.003 and 0.77, p=0.002 for hospital admission and hospitalization days). The difference in median time to first hospitalization was 2.1 months (p <.0001). Additional statistics are presented in the Table. Figure 1

      Conclusion
      In this retrospective analysis of updated SEER-Medicare data, first-line therapy with BCP was associated with longer median survival and reduced hospitalizations compared to CP in patients > 65 years of age.