Virtual Library

 x 
My Library Virtual Library FAQ

Start Your Search

J. Garcia



Author of

  • +

    P1.24 - Poster Session 1 - Clinical Care (ID 146)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Supportive Care
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P1.24-020 - Efficacy and safety of carboplatin and pemetrexed for the first line treatment of unfit patients to receive cisplatin with nonsquamous non small cell lung cancer (ID 1563)

      09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): J. Garcia

      • Abstract

      Background
      Background: Pemetrexed activity is synergistic with both carboplatin and cisplatin in chemonaive NSCLC patients. Two phase II Pem plus carboplatin trials have confirmed the doublet’s activity in NSCLC and response rates were 31% and 24% (Scagliotti and al 2003, Zinner and al 2005). Carboplatin is a good alternative in unfit patients suggesting a balanced benefit/risk profile when combined with Pem.

      Methods
      Sixty-four patients unfit to receive cisplatin with measurable stage III-B IV NSCLC, received at least one dose of chemotherapy. Pem 500 mg/m2 over 10 min on day 1 with folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation followed by carboplatin AUC 5 on the same day were given every 21 days for 4- 6 cycles. Primary endpoint was safety and efficacy ( progression free survival)

      Results
      Sixty four patients received at least one dose of chemotherapy. Median age was: 71.3 yrs (86−44,3), 90,6% of patients presented comorbilities , mainly cardiopathy (73,4%) . Stages IIIb: 15,6%, IV: 84,4%. Non squamous cell carcinoma: 100.% (adenocarcinoma: 92,2%, large cell carcinoma: 7.8% )Male 76,6%, female 23,4%. The median number of administered cycles was 4. Median progresion free survival and overall survival will be presented at the meeting. Grade 3/4 toxicities related to study drugs were: asthenia 6.1%, skin 3.1%, dyspnea 3.1% .Hematological grade 3/4 events were: neutropenia: 6.1%, thrombocytopenia: 1,6%, anemia: 14.1%. 10,9% of patients need dose reduction

      Conclusion
      In first line NSCLC, the combination of Pem plus carboplatin could be a valuable treatment alternative in unfit patients to recive cisplatin. Anemia is the most frequent toxicity in this combination.

  • +

    P3.09 - Poster Session 3 - Combined Modality (ID 214)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Combined Modality
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P3.09-016 - A phase II study of cisplatin and oral vinorelbine concomitantly with radiotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treatment: Eficacy and safety results. (ID 2687)

      09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): J. Garcia

      • Abstract

      Background
      It has been shown an improvement in survival with concurrent chemoradiation versus the sequential administration of both treatment modalities. In patients with unresectable stage III disease, chemotherapy may best be started soon after the diagnosis of unresectable NSCLC has been made. Cisplatin (CDDP) plus oral vinorelbine (OV) as induction and concomitant regimen with radiotherapy (RT) has shown good efficacy outcomes and safety profile (Vokes, Fournel, Krzakowski). The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and toxicities of the combination of CDDP and OV given at full doses concomitantly with RT in locally advanced (LA) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

      Methods
      Between February 2010 and December 2011, 48 chemo-naïve patients (p) with histologically confirmed unresectable stage IIIA/IIIB LA NSCLC were treated. Treatment consisted of 4 cycles (cy) of OV 60 mg/m[2] on days 1 and 8 and CDDP 80 mg/m[2] every 3 weeks plus RT 66 Gy starting on day 1, cy 2. The primary objective is the overall response rate (ORR) using RECIST 1.0. A standard Fleming two stage design was used. The sample size calculated with a type 1 error of 0.05 and type 2 error of 0.01, taking P~0~ 20% and P~1~ 40%. The study was approved by the local Ethical Committees of the participating institutions.

      Results
      Patient’s characteristics were: Median age 61 years (range 34-72); ≥ 65y 42%; males 89.6%; PS0 42% / PS1 58%; smokers 52%; adenocarcinoma 30% / squamous 64%; stage IIIA 46% / IIIB 54%. Median of days between initial diagnosis and study start was 28 days. 75% p completed the treatment as per protocol. Relative dose intensities of OV and CDDP were 97%/98%, respectively. 14.7% of cy were delayed, 11.8% due to toxicity. Dose of day 8 OV was canceled or delayed in 8.2% of cy. Hematological toxicities (% p): grade (g) 3/4 neutropenia 33.3%; g3 anemia 12.5%; g3/4 thrombocytopenia 16.6%; febrile neutropenia concomitant during CT-RT 14.6%. Non-hematological toxicities (% p): g3 esophagitis 12.5%; g3 dyspnea 4.2%, g3 vomiting 4.2%, g3-4 infection 4.2%. 2 treatment-related deaths were reported, both during cycle 1. 42 p (87.5%) received RT, 7.1% under 60 Gy, 23.8% with RT delays or interruptions due to adverse events. 44 p were evaluable for response. ORR 77.3% [CI 95%, 62.2-88.5], DCR 88.6% [CR 2 p (4.5%), PR 32 p (72.7%), SD 5 p (11.4%)]. Median follow-up was 19 months (m) (range 0.47-39.4). Median progression free survival (PFS), 12 m [CI 95%, 7.3-16.6]; 1-year PFS, 48.3% [CI 95%, 33.6-63], 2-year PFS, 30% [CI 95%, 15.8-44.2]. Median time to progression (TTP), 13.3 m [CI 95%, 9.7-16.9]; 1-year TTP, 51.7% [CI 95%, 36.9-66.6], 2-year TTP, 33.3% [18.5-48.1]. Median overall survival was not reached; 1-year and 2-year survival rates were, 72.3% [CI 95%, 59.6-85.1] and 49.4% [CI 95%, 33.8-64.9], respectively.

      Conclusion
      This prospective phase II trial shows that the schedule of cisplatin plus oral vinorelbine concomitant with radiotherapy from 2[nd] cycle obtains a good efficacy with an acceptable safety profile. Clinical trial information: EudraCT Number: 2009-010436-17