Virtual Library
Start Your Search
D. Tio
Author of
-
+
P1.17 - Poster Session 1 - Bronchoscopy, Endoscopy (ID 182)
- Event: WCLC 2013
- Type: Poster Session
- Track: Pulmonology + Endoscopy/Pulmonary
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/28/2013, 09:30 - 16:30, Exhibit Hall, Ground Level
-
+
P1.17-008 - Results of a close surveillance strategy for subjects with pre-invasive endobronchial squamous lesions (ID 2678)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): D. Tio
- Abstract
Background
The dismal overall 5-year survival of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is mainly due to advanced stage of disease at time of initial diagnosis in most and the inability to cure metastatic disease in all patients. In contrast, the prognoses of in situ mucosal and small parenchymal lesions are excellent. Early detection strategies might result in the identification of early-stage, (pre-)invasive lesions that are still eligible for curative treatment. The present study was set out to characterize the risk of lung cancer development in a cohort of high-risk subjects harboring pre-invasive endobronchial lesions and to assess the results of surveillance using autofluorescence bronchoscopy (AFB) and computed tomography (CT) scan.Methods
Between November 1995 and December 2012, one hundred and sixty-four at risk individuals with pre-invasive endobronchial lesions were monitored by repeated AFB and CT. During the course of surveillance, progression of lesions to cancer (in situ), recurrences and second primary cancers were treated with different modalities (e.g. endobronchial techniques, surgery, radiotherapy), depending on tumor stage and location. Log-rank tests were performed to examine the relation between baseline characteristics and progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS, respectively). Cox regression was used for multivariate survival analysis.Results
Demographical and clinical variables of the cohort are shown (Table). At inclusion, 80 individuals were identified with one or more high-grade pre-invasive lesions (severe dysplasia or CIS; HGD), whereas 84 subjects were identified solely with lower grade pre-invasive lesions (LGD). During close surveillance (median follow-up (FU) of 30 months, range 4-152), sixty-one lung cancers were detected (26 CT-detected, 35 AFB-detected cancers) in 55 individuals within a median time to event of 16.5 months. Mean PFS was similar between individuals with radiographically occult lesions vs. FU after surgery for early-stage NSCLC/ENT ca (122.3 vs. 126.9 months, p=0.237) and COPD vs. non-COPD (118.8 vs. 136.8 months, p=0.162). There was a relatively large difference in PFS between LGD and HGD groups (142.6 vs. 93.7 months, p=0.057). Independent risk determinants for OS were indication for surveillance (FU after surgery for early-stage NSCLC/ENT ca vs. radiographically occult lesions, p=0.008) and COPD-status (COPD vs. non-COPD, p<0.001).Referral for radiographically occult lesion Follow-up after surgery for early-stage NSCLC / ENT ca total individuals, n 164 92 72 Gender male 134 72 62 female 30 20 10 Age at baseline years, mean (range) 64.2 (42-83) 64.8 (42-81) 64.0 (43-82) Smoking status current smoker 75 44 31 former smoker 74 36 38 unknown 15 12 3 Smoking history Pack-years, mean (range) 45 (4-137) 45 (4-120) 40 (15-137) COPD-status COPD 100 56 44 non-COPD 45 22 23 unknown 19 14 5 AF Bronchoscopies Number, mean (range) 7 (1-27) 5 (2-27) 6 (1-18) CT-scans Number, mean (range) 3 (0-20) 2 (0-20) 3 (0-18) No. of detected lung cancers During surveillance period 61 29 32 Parenchymal cancer 21 12 9 Site-specific lesion progression 24 13 11 Interval cancer 10 4 6 Recurrences previous primaries 6 0 6 Patient outcome alive 80 56 24 died of lung cancer 33 13 20 died of other/unknown cause 51 23 28 Conclusion
Our findings demonstrate that individuals with pre-invasive endobronchial lesions are at high risk of developing (second primary) lung cancers. Combined surveillance using AFB in addition to CT screening facilitated early detection and early (endobronchial) intervention in most patients. Future clinical trials are warranted to determine whether the current approach improves patient outcome.