Author of

• 10883

  +

  P1.14 - Poster Session 1 - Mesothelioma (ID 194)

  • Event: WCLC 2013
  • Type: Poster Session
  • Track: Mesothelioma
  • Presentations: 1
  • Moderators:
  • Coordinates: 10/28/2013, 09:30 - 16:30, Exhibit Hall, Ground Level

  • 10891

    +

    P1.14-008 - Clinical features and current management of malignant pleural mesothelioma in France. TheGFPC 0804 study. (ID 2378)

    09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): H. Janicot
    • Abstract

    Background
    Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and aggressive primitive pleural tumour, which is associated with exposure to asbestos. Chemotherapy is the main part of therapy with new cytotoxic agents resulting in superior survival time. Recently the European Respiratory Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons proposed practical and up-to-date guidelines on the management of MPM. The objective of this study was to assess the current management of MPM in France between January 2005 and December 2008.

    Methods
    Observational, multicentric, national, study. The medical records of patients with MPM diagnosed during the study period in the 37 participating centers were retrospectively reviewed. Epidemiological data, clinical data, diagnosis procedures and several components of management were recorded. Mains inclusion criteria’s were a new diagnosis of MPM, a histology diagnosis and a management in the center.

    Results
    Four hundred and six patients (males: 76%) were included; median age: 68.9± 9.8 years; > 75 years: 27.8%; Asbestos exposure was found out in 259(63.8%) patients (251 professional exposure, 8 environmental exposure). Histological diagnosis was: epithelial MPM: 82.9%, sarcomatoid MPM: 10%, biphasic MPM 7.1%. The main diagnosis procedure was thoracoscopy (296 (73.1%)). Thirty patients underwent surgery (25 radical surgery, 5 pleurectomy). Pleurodesis was performed 191 times. Prophylactic drain site radiotherapy was performed in 268. Three hundred and three patients (74.6%) received first-line combination chemotherapy (mean cycles: 4.7 ± 1.7, median 6); 162 (40.2%) received second line chemotherapy (mean cycles: 3.5 ± 1.9, median 3); 56 ( 13 %) received third line chemotherapy (3.1± 2, median 3). One and two year survival rates will be updated at the congress.

    Conclusion
    This study provides an assessment of diagnosis modes and therapeutic strategies for the management of MPM in France. Further analyses are needed to model the management strategies and assess the cost-effectiveness of this disease.