Virtual Library
Start Your Search
K. Chen
Author of
-
+
P1.12 - Poster Session 1 - NSCLC Early Stage (ID 203)
- Event: WCLC 2013
- Type: Poster Session
- Track: Medical Oncology
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/28/2013, 09:30 - 16:30, Exhibit Hall, Ground Level
-
+
P1.12-021 - Development and validation of a clinical prediction model for N2 lymph node metastasis in stage I non-small cell lung cancer (ID 2949)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): K. Chen
- Abstract
Background
The true incidence of occult N2 lymph node metastasis in patients with clinical stageⅠnon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. Estimation of the probability of N2 lymph node metastasis can assist physicians when making diagnosis and treatment decisions.Methods
We reviewed the medical records of 739 patients with computed tomography–defined N0 NSCLC that had an exact Tumor-Node-Metastasis stage after surgery. A random subset of three fourths of the patients (n=554) were selected to develope the prediction model. Logistic regression analysis of the clinical characteristics was used to estimate the independent predictors of N2 lymph node metastasis. A prediction model was then built and internally validated by using cross validation and externally validated by the remaining one fourth(n=185) patients which made up the validation data set. The model was also compared to 2 previously described models.Results
We identified 4 independent predictors of N2 disease: a younger age, larger tumor size, central tumor location, and adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma pathology. The model showed good calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow test: P = .92) with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.748 (95% confidence interval, 0.687-0.809). The AUC of our model was better than those of the other two models when validated with independent data.Table 1 . Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis
Figure 1 Figure 1. The ROC curves of our model, the VA model and the Fudan model for all patients of group B. The AUC of our model was 0.786 (95% CI, 0.690-0.881); the VA model was 0.673 (95% CI, 0.554-0.792); the Fudan model was 0.757 (95% CI, 0.659-0.885).Variable Regression Coefficient P OR 95%CI Lower 95%CI Upper Age -0.032 0.007 0.969 0.957 0.981 Tumor Size 0.456 <0.001 1.577 1.449 1.705 Central 1.753 <0.001 5.771 5.453 6.089 Adenocarcinoma /mixed 1.787 <0.001 5.970 5.546 6.394 Constant -2.983 0.001 0.051 Conclusion
Our prediction model estimated the pretest probability of N2 disease in computed tomography–defined stageⅠNSCLC and was more accurate than the existing models. Use of our model can be of assistance when making clinical decisions about invasive or expensive mediastinal staging procedures.