Virtual Library

 x 
My Library Virtual Library FAQ

Start Your Search

M. Tiseo



Author of

  • +

    P1.11 - Poster Session 1 - NSCLC Novel Therapies (ID 208)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P1.11-033 - Afatinib in EGFR mutant non-small-cell lung cancer patients with acquired resistance to reversible EGFR-TKIs (ID 2285)

      09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): M. Tiseo

      • Abstract

      Background
      Afatinib, an irreversible EGFR-HER2 dual inhibitor, demonstrated superiority versus standard platinum-based chemotherapy as front-line therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC) with activating Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) mutations. In pretreated NSCLC afatinib failed to improve survival when compared to placebo in patients refractory to gefitinib or erlotinib and not selected for EGFR status. Aim of the present study was to evaluate clinical efficacy of afatinib in EGFR mutant NSCLC patients (pts) with secondary resistance to reversible EGFR-TKIs.

      Methods
      We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 97 EGFR mutant lung cancer pts resistant to EGFR-TKI according to criteria used in the LUX-Lung 1 trial (Miller VA, Lancet Oncol 2012) and treated with Afatinib at the daily dose of 40-50 mg. The drug was given as compassionate use.

      Results
      The study included individuals with a median age of 62,5 year. The majority were females (N=63/64.9%), never/former smokers (N=94/96,9%), with good performance status (ECOG PS 0-1; N=90/90.2%) and pretreated with > 3 therapy lines (N=68/70.0%). EGFR status was assessed in tumor tissue obtained at the time of original diagnosis. The majority of pts (N=64, 66%) harbored a deletion in exon 19, while T790M mutation was detected in two cases including one case with double exon 19 and T790M mutation. Among the 95 pts evaluable for toxicity, 54.7% had any grade skin rash, including 11.6% with grade 3, and 50,5% had any grade of diarrhea, with grade 3 recorded in 10,5%. Among the 87 pts evaluable for efficacy, response rate (RR) was 11.5%, with a median progression free-survival and overall survival of 3.9 months and 7.3 months respectively. In 25 pts a tumor biopsy was repeated immediately before starting Afatinib therapy and 1 patient out of 5 individuals harboring T790M mutation showed a short extracerebral partial response, with following brain progression.

      Conclusion
      Our findings suggest that afatinib is modestly effective in EGFR mutant NSCLC with acquired resistance to reversible EGFR-TKIs.

  • +

    P2.11 - Poster Session 2 - NSCLC Novel Therapies (ID 209)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P2.11-023 - BE-Positive: Gefitinib in first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. A combined retrospective and prospective analysis from Italian patients. (ID 1881)

      09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): M. Tiseo

      • Abstract

      Background
      Advanced NSCLC patients have an extremely poor prognosis with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%. In 2009, the European Medicines Agency approved gefitinib, a reversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, at the dose of 250 mg daily for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with EGFR activating mutations. As the first-line EGFR mutation positive data at that time were mainly in Asian populations a prospective phase IV, open-label, single-arm study of first-line gefitinib in Caucasian patients was presented: this trial confirmed the activity and efficacy of gefitinib in 106 Caucasian patients (Douillard EMCTO 2013). In the same way, we initially collected retrospectively, continuing then prospectively, the data of NSCLC EGFR-mutation positive Italian patients treated with first-line gefitinib, with the aim to evaluate the therapeutic outcomes and the approaches beyond progression in a “real life population”.

      Methods
      We collected data of patients who started gefitinib from June 2009 until May 2013. Primary endpoint was the evaluation of first line outcomes, in terms of: objective response rate (ORR), duration of treatment, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Secondary endpoint is the evaluation of the outcomes beyond progression to gefitinib. Here we report the results of first-line gefitinib of a large number of Caucasian patients.

      Results
      Data of 203 patients from 23 Italian Institutions were collected. The main patients characteristics were: median age 67 (range: 33-87), male/female 76/127, ECOG performance status (PS) 0/1/2/3/4 in 89/92/18/2/2 patients, 90.6% adenocarcinoma (in our study the percentage of carcinoma non otherwise specified was 1.5%), never/former/current smoker in 129/64/10, del19/L858R/uncommon in 128/57/18. In one case a T790M mutation ex novo was found in association with the deletion of the exon 19 (not all the patients were tested for this mutation at baseline). A median time for obtaining the EGFR test result was 8-15 days (more than 30% of the patients got the results in less than one week). Patients evaluable at the time of data lock were 168, of these 3 (1.8%) patients achieved a complete response, 72 (42.9%) a partial response for an ORR of 44.7%, 54 (32.1%) patients were stable. Median treatment with gefitinib was 38 weeks. Main toxicities were: grade 3-4 skin rash and diarrhea in 1.8% and 4.2%, respectively. Treatment was definitely stopped due toxicity in 4.2% of patients. After progression in 5 cases a re-biopsy was performed and 94 (56%) received a second-line treatment.

      Conclusion
      BE-Positive is the first study reporting results of first-line gefitinib in a large "real life population" of Caucasian patients. Data were firstly collected in a retrospective fashion, than in a prospective way. This study shows that Caucasian patients reported lower ORR when indirectly compared to Asian counterparts, but this is probably due to the partial analysis of the patients, excluding at this time those who are still on treatment. However, the tolerability profile was excellent and the median time of treatment is quite overlapping to literature data. The outcomes of PFS, OS and treatment beyond gefitinib progression will be reported when mature.

  • +

    P3.06 - Poster Session 3 - Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers (ID 178)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Biology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P3.06-036 - Prospective correlative study of FDG-PET SUV and proteomic profile (VeriStrat) of Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with erlotinib (ID 2693)

      09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): M. Tiseo

      • Abstract

      Background
      VeriStrat (VS) is a multivariate protein serum test that classifies Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients in 2 categories VS Good or VS Poor according to the overall survival (OS) of patients treated with EGFR-TKIs. Recently, the prospective Phase III PROSE study showed that the VS algorithm is predictive of differential OS benefit for erlotinib (E) vs second line standard chemotherapy (CT): VS Poor classified patients had worse OS on E compared to CT, while there was no significant difference between treatments outcome in the VSG group. Aim of the current study was to evaluate if baseline Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) of FDG-PET may help to optimize treatment choice between E or CT IN VS Good classified pts.

      Methods
      Plasma samples were collected before the beginning of E from metastatic NSCLC patients. Acquired spectra were classified according to the VS algorithm. The FDG-PET was performed tha day before the beginning of E. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

      Results
      Thirty eight NSCLC patients on E therapy with the following characteristics were analyzed: median age 62 years old, 63% were males, 53% had adenocarcinoma histology, response rate was 26%, median OS 10 mos and TTP 3.4 mos. Twenty-six (68%) were classified as VS Good, 12 (32%) as Poor. TTP and OS for VS Good and Poor were 4.1 vs 2.1 mos (HR 0.86, log-rank p=0.6) and 11.1 vs 4.1 mos (HR 0.45,log-rank p=0.02), respectively. All VS Poor classified patients had SUV ≥ 7 and had the worst TTP and OS; VS Good classified patients with baseline SUV level ≥ 7 had worse OS (10 mos) and worse TTP (2.1 mos) compared to those who were VS Good and had SUV<7 (OS 16 mos) (TTP 13.8 mos).

      Conclusion
      The study confirmed that VS Poor classified patients had significantly shorter OS than those classified as VS Good. Patients with VS Good profile and with baseline FDG-PET SUVs levels <7 may benefit more from EGFR-TKIs than VS Good patients with higher FDG-PET SUV, suggesting that FDG-PET analysis may be a clinically useful tool for EGFR-TKIs therapy selection.