Virtual Library

 x 
My Library Virtual Library FAQ

Start Your Search

N. Takigawa



Author of

  • +

    P1.10 - Poster Session 1 - Chemotherapy (ID 204)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P1.10-020 - Dose adjustment of single agent amrubicin in lung cancer patients with impaired hepatic function (ID 1348)

      09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): N. Takigawa

      • Abstract

      Background
      The pharmacokinetics (PK) of amrubicin (AMR) in lung cancer patients with impaired hepatic function have not been reported. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the PK of AMR and its major metabolite, amrubicinol (AMR-OH), in lung cancer patients with or without impaired hepatic function, and to assess the validity of dose adjustment of AMR based on hepatic function.

      Methods
      Eligibility criteria included the presence of histologically or cytologically proven lung cancer, an ECOG PS of 0 to 2, age 20 to 70 years old, and no evidence of hepatitis B virus infection. The dose was adjusted from 25 to 45 mg/m[2]/day (iv, days 1-3, q3w) based on the history of prior treatment and baseline values of total bilirubin (T-bil), AST and ALT (Table 1). Figure 1

      Results
      Five patients with impaired hepatic function (arm I) and 10 patients with normal hepatic function (arm N) were enrolled. Terminal half-life (t~1/2~) and clearance of AMR in plasma, and t~1/2~ of AMR-OH in blood did not differ between the two arms. Area under the curve (AUC~0-24~) of AMR in plasma and AUC~0-120~ of AMR-OH in blood in arm I were similar or lower compared to those in arm N (Table 2). The dose-adjusted AUCs of AMR and AMR-OH did not show a tendency to increase with increases in baseline T-bil, AST and ALT. Two deaths occurred in arm I (one due to disease progression, and the other due to an unspecified reason), but the toxicities in arm I were not severe compared with those in arm N. Figure 1

      Conclusion
      These data show the validity of dose adjustment of AMR in patients with impaired hepatic function.

  • +

    P2.09 - Poster Session 2 - Combined Modality (ID 213)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Combined Modality
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P2.09-005 - Cisplatin, S-1 and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A phase II study of Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group 0501 (ID 1202)

      09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): N. Takigawa

      • Abstract

      Background
      Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). However, its cure rate remains unsatisfied, and further improvement in the treatment outcome is strongly warranted. S-1 (S), an oral fluoropyrimidine, is a new active agent possessing a radio-sensitizing effect. Additionally, combining S and cisplatin (P) offered an active and safe regimen for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of S plus P with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) for LA-NSCLC.

      Methods
      Patients with stage IIIA/IIIB, aged ≤75 years and PS 0-1, and without any prior chemotherapy were eligible for this study. Patients were treated with P (40 mg/m² on day 1, 8, 29 and 36) and S (40 mg/m²/dose b.i.d. on days 1-14 and 29-42) and TRT (60 Gy/30 fr over 6 weeks starting on day 1). Primary endpoint was respsonse rate, and required sample size was 48 patients.

      Results
      Between 2006 and 2009, 48 patients were enrolled (37 men; median age, 66 years; PS 0/1, 36/14; IIIA/IIIB, 23/25; sq/non-sq, 22/26). Partial response was observed in 37 patients (77%; 95% confidence interval: 63-88%). At a median follow-up of 54 months for the surviving patients, median progression-free survival and median survival time were 9.3 months and 31.3 months, respectively. No difference in efficacy (response and survivals) was observed stratified by histology (sq vs. non-sq). Toxicities were generally mild, including G3/4 neutropenia (44%), G3/4 thrombocytopenia (13%), G3 febrile neutropenia (8%) and G3 pneumonitis (4%). No one developed Gr3/4 esophagitis. No toxic deaths have occurred.

      Conclusion
      This chemoradiotherapy regimen yielded a favorable overall survival data. Also, it was well-tolerated in patients with LA-NSCLC as compared with concurrent docetaxel plus P with TRT therapy especially in term of TRT-related toxicities.