Virtual Library

 x 
My Library Virtual Library FAQ

Start Your Search

A. Fusi



Author of

  • +

    P1.09 - Poster Session 1 - Combined Modality (ID 212)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Combined Modality
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P1.09-011 - Phase I clinical trial assessing the MEK inhibitor selumetinib (AZD6244; ARRY-142886) with concomitant thoracic radiotherapy (RT) in patients with Stage III-IV non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (ID 1415)

      09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): A. Fusi

      • Abstract

      Background
      The RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK signalling cascade has a central role in cancer proliferation and in modulating response to treatment. RAS mutations can confer a radiation-refractory phenotype and MAPK signaling can be stimulated by treatment with ionizing radiation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Selumetinib (AZD6244; ARRY-142886) is an orally available inhibitor of MEK1/2 which was shown to enhance the effect of radiotherapy in preclinical studies. This effect was due to the ability of selumetinib to directly sensitize tumor cells to the cytotoxic effect of radiation and to modulate tumor vessel functionality by reducing VEGF-A expression. In a Phase II study, selumetinib given in combination with docetaxel showed promising activity in NSCLC patients with KRAS activating mutations. Aim To determine the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) of selumetinib in combination with standard dose thoracic radiotherapy (RT) in NSCLC.

      Methods
      Selumetinib (Hyd-Sulfate capsule) was administered orally twice daily as a single agent for one week and then in combination with thoracic RT for 6 to 6.5 weeks (60 to 66 Gy in 30 to 33 fractions) in a single institution, open label Phase I trial using a modified Fibonacci sequence. Prior standard chemotherapy was permitted with a minimum interval between day8 of the last cycle of chemotherapy and day1 of administration of selumetinib of ≥ 2weeks. Other eligibility included: histologic or cytologic diagnosis of NSCLC, stage III not suitable for concurrent chemo-radiotherapy or stage IV with dominant thoracic symptoms, disease encompassable within a radical RT treatment volume, ECOG PS 0-1., no prior RT or investigational agents.

      Results
      A total of six consecutive patients with inoperable stage III (n=3) or stage IV (n=3) NSCLC were given selumetinib 50 mg twice daily (dose level 1) with concomitant thoracic RT (59.8-66 Gy in 30-33 fractions). All patients completed the combined treatment. Selumetinib delivery was > 80%. Four out of the six patients had dose interruptions of 2-3 days due to expected adverse events (AEs). Skin rash (6/6), diarrhoea (5/6) and fatigue (4/6) were the most common toxicities. Grade 3/4 AEs included hypertension (2/6), diarrhoea (2/6), skin rash (1/6), pulmonary embolism (1/6), fatigue (1/6) and pericardial effusion (1/6). Pulmonary embolism (grade 3) was considered not related to the study treatment. One patient experienced dose limiting toxicity (DLT) consisting of a combination of diarrhoea (grade 3) and fatigue (grade 3). Response to treatment was assessed 4 weeks post RT. Distant recurrence was seen in 1 patient; 3 patients had SD, 1 patient experienced a PR and 1 a CR. Median duration of response was 2 months (range 1-4 months).

      Conclusion
      Selumetinib given at 50 mg twice daily with concomitant radical thoracic RT was tolerated with no unexpected toxicities or enhancement of expected RT toxicities. Although the protocol-defined criteria to further escalate the selumetinib dose were met, because of the heterogeneous and small patient cohort and AEs encountered further evaluation of the 50 mg twice daily was preferred in order to obtained additional safety data. An expanded cohort of 15 patients having additional FLT-PET scans.

  • +

    P2.06 - Poster Session 2 - Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers (ID 165)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Biology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P2.06-016 - Expression and clinical significance of the monocarboxylate transporter MCT1 as a novel therapeutic target in Small-Cell-Lung-Cancer (SCLC) (ID 1473)

      09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): A. Fusi

      • Abstract

      Background
      Small cell lung is a rapidly proliferating disease. Because of its high proliferation index, cancer cells rely on glycolysis, rather than oxidative phosphorylation, for ATP generation. Furthermore SCLC tumours often contain regions of hypoxia which switches tumour cells to a glycolytic phenotype. Increased glycolysis leads to increased lactate production which is effluxed from the cell in order to prevent reduced intracellular pH or inhibition of metabolic pathways via the monocarboxylate transporter (MCT) proteins MCT1 and MCT4. Inhibition of these transporters has been proposed as a method of selectively targeting highly glycolytic cancer cells. AZD3965 is an orally bioavailable MCT1 specific inhibitor currently under evaluation in phase I clinical trials. In an in vitro model of SCLC we have recently shown that in hypoxic conditions resistance to AZD3965 is associated with increased MCT4 levels (Polanski et al. submitted). Aim: To examined the expression and clinical significance of MCT1 and MCT4 in SCLC.

      Methods
      Archival SCLC biopsy specimens and clinical data from 78 patients presenting to the University Hospital of South Manchester and the Christie Hospital between 1994 and 2005 were analyzed. Nine representative cores from the tumour specimens were used to generate three TMAs. Sections were then stained for the markers MCT1, MCT4 and for the hypoxic marker CAIX. Staining was evaluated by two independent scorers and extent and intensity of the staining were estimated. A combined score for each case was calculated as the mean product of extent and intensity for all the cores in a case. The association between MCT1, MCT4 or CAIX and known prognostic factors was evaluated by Fisher’s exact test. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess overall survival rates and Log Rank test was used for the comparison of the survival distributions.

      Results
      The proportion of tumours with any expression of MCT1, MCT4 or CAIX was 99%, 99%, 90% respectively. Higher levels of expression (intensity x extent) were observed for MCT1 (median=8.17) compared to MCT4 (median=2.21; p<0.001). A positive correlation was observed for CAIX expression and MCT4 expression. Tumours with CAIX expression, high MCT1 expression (>median) and low MCT4 expression ( 10 x 109/L, platelets < 150 x 109/L, Na < 135 mmol/L; LDH > 550 IU/L). However, high MCT1 expression score was associated with worse survival (14 vs. 32 months; p=0.019). Neither MCT4 nor CAIX expression was prognostic. Of the known prognostic factors assessed, extensive stage was significantly associated with shorter overall survival (6 vs. 27 months; p<0.001).

      Conclusion
      MCT1 and MCT4 are often expressed in SCLC and 21% cases in this series express a pattern associated with potential sensitivity to MCT1 inhibition. Higher expression of MCT1 is an adverse prognostic factor in univariate analysis reinforcing further evaluation of MCT1 inhibition in this disease.