Author of

• 10548

  +

  P1.03 - Poster Session 1 - Technology and Novel Development (ID 150)

  • Event: WCLC 2013
  • Type: Poster Session
  • Track: Biology
  • Presentations: 1
  • Moderators:
  • Coordinates: 10/28/2013, 09:30 - 16:30, Exhibit Hall, Ground Level

  • 10554

    +

    P1.03-006 - The efficiency of detection of <em>KRAS</em>, <em>EGFR </em>and <em>BRAF </em>mutations in primary lung cancer via peripheral blood circulating tumour cells (ID 2762)

    09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): D.V. Freydina
    • Abstract

    Background
    Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) are present in the blood of a proportion of patients with lung cancer. However, it is currently unclear how suitable CTCs are for use in the detection of predictive genetic mutations. We sought to determine the utility of DNA extracted from CTCs to screen for the underlying primary tumour mutation.

    Methods
    Using ScreenCell™ MB devices, from 20/01/12 to 25/01/2013, CTCs were captured in peripheral blood of 100 patients who underwent surgery for lung cancer at The Royal Brompton Hospital. DNA was extracted using QIAamp DNA Micro kit (QIAGEN) followed by whole-genome amplification using GenomePlex® SingleCell WGA kit (Sigma). DNA from matched primary tumours was used as reference. Mutation detection in EGFR and KRAS genes was undertaken using cobas®4800 (Roche) and single-strand conformation analysis for BRAF gene. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were undertaken to measure predictive performance of mutation testing in CTCs.

    Results
    The DNA extracted from CTCs, were of sufficient quality to allow mutation analyses to be successfully performed in 100%, 99%, and 98% of samples for EGFR, KRAS, and BRAF genes, respectively. In CTC DNA, the KRAS mutation rate (codons 12/13 and 61) was 9.1% and concordance with the primary tumour was 78.8%. Six mutations were detected in CTCs, but not in primary tumours, and 13 mutations in primary tumours were not detected in corresponding CTC samples. Three mutations were detected in matched CTC and primary tumour specimens. One mutation in EGFR was detected in CTC DNA and 3 mutations were detected in primary tumours. In all cases, the mutations were detected in discordant specimens. The concordance between mutations detection in CTCs and primary tumours was 95.8%. BRAF V600E mutation was not detected in any sample. In general, the results suggested low sensitivity but high specificity (Table). Due to low number of EGFR mutations detected, test performance results require further validation.

    The performance of mutation testing in circulating tumour cells

    Statistic	KRAS	EGFR
    Sensitivity (95% CI), %	18.8 (4.05-45.6)	0.0 (0.0-70.8)
    Specificity (95% CI), %	91.8 (83.0-96.9)	98.9 (94.1-100)
    Positive predictive value (95% CI), %	33.3 (7.49-70.1)	0.0 (0.0-97.5)
    Negative predictive value (95% CI), %	83.8 (73.8-91.1)	96.8 (91.0-99.3)

    Conclusion
    The result of our study indicates that the DNA extracted from CTCs can be used to screen for primary tumour mutations with reasonable concordance. Differences in the mutation results from the CTC and primary tumours needs to be explored in more detail and may be due to issues related to processing and / or tumour versus CTC heterogeneity.

• 12812

  +

  P3.20 - Poster Session 3 - Early Detection and Screening (ID 174)

  • Event: WCLC 2013
  • Type: Poster Session
  • Track: Imaging, Staging & Screening
  • Presentations: 1
  • Moderators:
  • Coordinates: 10/30/2013, 09:30 - 16:30, Exhibit Hall, Ground Level

  • 12821

    +

    P3.20-009 - Diagnostic performance of a filter-based antibody-independent peripheral blood circulating tumour cell capture paired with cytomorphologic criteria for the diagnosis of lung cancer (ID 2782)

    09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): D.V. Freydina
    • Abstract

    Background
    The ability to capture and characterise peripheral blood circulating tumour cells (CTCs) has the potential for the development of a blood test for cancer. A number of technological platforms are available to obtain CTCs including filtration-based devices utilising advances of antibody independent capture of cells. This technique shows promising results in experimental conditions; however, its performance has not yet been well evaluated in a clinical setting. We have evaluated diagnostic performance of filtration-based technology using cytomorphologic criteria in patients undergoing surgery for lung cancer.

    Methods
    From 06/03/2012 to 24/01/2013 we obtained and processed blood from 74 patients undergoing surgery for known or suspected lung cancer using ScreenCell[TM] Cyto devices. Captured cells were stained using H&E and independently assessed by two pathologists (AGN, AR) for the presence of atypical cells suspicious for cancer. Results were reported as confirmed cancer, suspicious or no evidence for cancer. Diagnostic performance was evaluated against the reference of cancer identified within surgically obtained specimens reported by a principal pathologist. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were undertaken. Inter-observer agreement was established by kappa-statistics.

    Results
    According to histopathology assessment, 42 patients (56.7%) had primary lung cancer, 18 patients (24.3%) had metastatic cancer (predominantly of colorectal origin), and 14 patients (18.9%) had benign lung diseases. The proportion of patients in which cells suspicious for cancer were identified was 39 (52.7%) and 42 (56.7%) as reported by two pathologists. Among those cases, 6 (15.4%) and 14 (33.3%) were reported as confirmatory. The agreement between the pathologists was 77% corresponding to a kappa-statistics of 53.7% indicating moderate agreement. In metastatic cancer patients, suspicious cells were discovered in 10 (55.6%) and 9 (50%) cases by two pathologists. In non-cancer patients, suspicious cell were found in 6 (42.8%) and 5 (35.7%) cases by two pathologists, respectively. The test performance for the diagnosis of cancer using cytomorphological criteria yielded poor-to-moderate sensitivity and specificity values, high positive predictive values and low negative predictive values (Table).

    The performance of the diagnosis of cancer using filter-based antibody-independent technique of CTCs trapping

    Statistic	Pathologist 1	Pathologist 2
    Sensitivity (95% CI), %	55.0 (41.6-67.9)	61.7 (48.2-73.9)
    Specificity (95% CI), %	57.1 (28.9-82.3)	64.3 (35.1-87.2)
    Positive Predictive Value (95% CI), %	84.6 (69.5-94.1)	88.1 (74.4-96.0)
    Negative Predictive Value (95% CI), %	22.9 (10.4-40.1)	28.1 (13.7-46.7)

    Conclusion
    The results of our study highlight the potential of filter-based antibody-independent technology to develop an accurate blood test for the diagnosis of cancer in the peripheral blood. However, conventional cytomorphological criteria used for the diagnosis provide inadequate sensitivity and specificity. Improved performance with immunocytochemistry is still required prior to further clinical validation.