Virtual Library
Start Your Search
L. Le
Author of
-
+
MA 09 - The Current Status of Radiation Oncology (ID 666)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Mini Oral
- Track: Locally Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:Tomoki Kimura, Yong Chan Ahn
- Coordinates: 10/17/2017, 11:00 - 12:30, Room 316
-
+
MA 09.02 - Ultra-Central Tumours Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: A Single Institutional Experience (ID 8758)
11:05 - 11:10 | Author(s): L. Le
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Stereotactic body radiotherapy of “ultra-central” (UC) lung tumours, PTV directly abuts/overlaps the proximal bronchial tree (PBT), trachea, esophagus, pulmonary vein/artery, are considered to be at higher risk of toxicity. The purpose of this study is to review the outcomes and toxicities of Ultra-central lung tumours, compared to central tumours.
Method:
A retrospective review based on a prospective database of patients treated with lung SBRT from January 2006- December 2015 was conducted. Patients with central tumours defined using RTOG 0813 criteria and ultracentral tumours were included. 115 patients (53%) received 60Gy/8 and 61 (28%) received 48Gy/4. At our institution, the recommended Dmax for esophagus is 45Gy and 40Gy for 8 and 4 fractions, respectively. The Dmax and D10cc constraints for trachea, proximal bronchial tree, heart, and major vessels (including pulmonary artery and vein) are 48Gy and 40Gy for 4 fractions and 64 and 60Gy for 8 fractions. Toxicity was graded using CTCAE v3.0. Log-rank test was used to compare overall and cause-specific survival. Local, regional, and distant recurrence were compared using Gray’s test.
Result:
215 tumours were analyzed (189 C and 26 UC). The median age for C and UC were 75 years and 72.5 years. Median tumour size and PTV volume were 2.2 cm (range 0.9-5.7) and 41.7 cm3 (range 9.7-246.3) (C group) and 2.5 cm (0.8-5.5) and 58.2 cm3 (16.8-238.3) (UC group). The percentage of squamous cell carcinoma was higher in the UC group (15%, n=29 in C; 38%, n=10 in UC). The median follow-up was 20.3 months (24.5 mo for patients still alive). Median overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) was 34 mo and 53.8 mo for C and 20.1 mo and 28.2 mo for UC, respectively. Differences in OS and CSS between the two groups did not meet statistical significance (p=0.24 and p=0.14, respectively). Local, regional, and distant failure rates were 3%, 8% and 18% in the central tumour group and 0%, 9% and 25% in the ultra-central tumour group at 2 years. There was no statistically significant difference found in the rates of recurrence between the two groups. The rates of any grade 2 or higher toxicity (hemoptysis, esophageal toxicity, cough, dyspnea, pneumonitis) was 9% (n=17) in the C and 7.7% (n=2) in UC group (p=0.89). There were no known grade 4 or 5 toxicities.
Conclusion:
In our experience, SBRT to ultra-central tumours resulted in effective local control and no excessive risk of toxicity compared to central tumours.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
P1.13 - Radiology/Staging/Screening (ID 699)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
- Track: Radiology/Staging/Screening
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/16/2017, 09:30 - 16:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B + C)
-
+
P1.13-004 - The Role of Lymph Node Staging by EBUS-TBNA in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. (ID 8070)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): L. Le
- Abstract
Background:
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an option for treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a minimally invasive, diagnostic modality for mediastinal and hilar staging of NSCLC. We evaluated the diagnostic value of EBUS-TBNA in SBRT candidates and compared it to that of computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) scans.
Method:
Inclusion criteria for this single institutional retrospective study included 1) biopsy-proven or clinically suspicious NSCLC with diameter <6 cm; 2) no evidence of distant metastasis; 3) EBUS-TBNA staging between April 2008 and November 2014; 4) medically SBRT-eligible other than nodal staging. CT and PET positive nodes were defined as short axis ≧1cm and standardized uptake value ≧2.5, respectively. Node positive by clinical-pathologic confirmation (NPCP) was defined as confirmed malignancy by EBUS-TBNA or clinically diagnosed recurrence in hilar or mediastinal lymph nodes within one year after SBRT. The survival after SBRT was compared between CT or PET node-positive but EBUS-TBNA result-negative patients, and a matched cohort (tumor size; radiation dose; operability) who underwent SBRT in our institution within the same time period but without EBUS-TBNA staging.
Result:
There were 35 eligible patients (mean age 77±8.2, 24 male). Thirty-two (91.4%) patients had pathological confirmation of NSCLC (mean diameter 2.5±1.0 cm) (T1a N=12, T1b N=15, T2a N=7, T2b N=1). Thirty (85.7%) patients were medically inoperable. After EBUS-TBNA, 20 out of 24 patients who had positive nodes in CT (N=13) or PET (N=17) were ultimately pathologically N0. All eleven image-negative patients were N0 following EBUS-TBNA. Thirty-one patients (20 image positive plus 11 image negative) underwent SBRT. Sensitivity/specificity of CT, PET and EBUS-TBNA for NPCP were 42.9/64.3%, 100/64.3% and 57.1/100%, respectively. Positive predictive value of CT and PET for NPCP was 23.1% and 41.2%, respectively. Negative predictive value of CT, PET and EBUS for NPCP was 81.8%, 100% and 90.3%, respectively. A 1:4 (Case; N=20, Control; N=76) match was obtained. Regional failure-free survival (p=0.71, HR=0.88 CI 0.45-1.74) and disease-free survival (p=0.77, HR=1.10 CI 0.58-2.11) of the Case were not significantly different from the ones of Control. There were no major complications related to EBUS procedures.
Conclusion:
EBUS-TBNA can be considered for invasive staging in SBRT-eligible NSCLC patients with radiographically positive lymph nodes because of its safety and possibility of false positive imaging. If EBUS-TBNA result is negative, these patients may remain candidates for SBRT with comparable outcomes to those who are conventionally selected for SBRT.
