Virtual Library

 x 
My Library Virtual Library FAQ

Start Your Search

E. Gobbini



Author of

  • +

    P3.11 - Poster Session 3 - NSCLC Novel Therapies (ID 211)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P3.11-041 - Treatment with crizotinib in patients with IV stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with ALK translocation: a single institution experience. (ID 2961)

      09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): E. Gobbini

      • Abstract

      Background
      Crizotinibis is a MET inhibitor, having also an activity on ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase) and ROS1 (c-ros oncogene 1) pathways. The ALK translocation is described in 4% of NSCLC and these patients (pts) benefit from crizotinib therapy with a response rate (RR) ranging from 51 to 61%.The drug is already approved by FDA and EMA; in Italy crizotinib is available in first line within controlled clinical trials and, until April 2013, within expanded access program (EAP).

      Methods
      From June 2010 to February 2013, 155 pts with advanced NSCLC were analyzed for Alk translocation using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) at our institution. The selection criteria were: adenocarcinoma histology, never or ex smoker, EGFR status WT. Main pts characteristics were: 59% males, median age 57,5 years (range 26-76), 77 former smoker (76 pts for more than 15 years). Tissue samples were available from primary tumor and metastases in 78 and 22%, respectively, having 73% of cases with cytological material. In 23,2% of the specimens Alk rearrangement was not evaluable due to poor quality and/or quantity issues.

      Results
      Among the 155 pts, 22 (14%) are ALK translocated: 19 were treated within PROFILE clinical trials and 3 patients in the EAP. 20 pts are currently evaluable for response and toxicity: 6 of them received crizotinib as first-line treatment, the others in subsequent lines. The response rate was equal to 70%. The total number of administered cycles is 235.The reduction of the dose (7% of cycles) was necessary in two pts: in 1 case due to bradicardia and fatigue G3 (in first line treatment) and in the other one due to neutropenia G3 (in second line).The observed toxicities were mostly grade 1-2 (fatigue 47%, bradycardia 5,8%, visual disorder 5,8%, anemia 29%, neutropenia 18% and nausea 12%); grade 3-4 was less common. The temporary cessation of treatment was required in 3 pts (range 4-15 days) for grade 3-4 toxicity (mostly neutropenia plus fatigue). No drug interruption for unacceptable toxicity was reported. The most common progression sites were brain (37%) and bone (27%).

      Conclusion
      The introduction of a selection criteria (such as negative EGFR status) leads on an increase of our cases of Alk traslocated pts compared to literature data; this selection is moreover recommended in diagnostic algorithm recently proposed by the Italian Expert Panel (Marchetti A et al, JTO 2013). Efficacy and tolerability profile are consistent with published data.

  • +

    P3.24 - Poster Session 3 - Supportive Care (ID 160)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Supportive Care
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P3.24-009 - Histologic and genotypic evolution in lung cancer harboring mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR): a clinical case. (ID 708)

      09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): E. Gobbini

      • Abstract

      Background
      This is a clinical case of an EGFR-mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with adenocarcinoma (ADC) histology: a subsequent diagnosis of high grade neuroendocrine small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) carrying an EGFR mutation was done at the first re-biopsy and further, a sarcomatous cancer was finally diagnosed. Recent publications were focused on drug-resistance mechanisms in patients with a specific biomolecular alteration re-biopsed after receiving the targeted therapy: in some cases morphologic and immunophenotypic changes were described. This finding suggests the possibility of "clonal resistance" with a selective pressure of some groups of cells, even if the histopathological features of these mechanisms have not yet been completely elucidated.

      Methods
      A 62-year-old caucasian man, with past smoking habit, presented with a 2-week history of cough and dyspnea. After a diagnosis of stage IV lung ADC, he received, on March 2010, 1st line treatment with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 plus pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 on Day 1 every 21 days, for 6 cycles. He achieved a partial response on computed tomography (CT) and a marked regression of his symptoms. On August 2011, a CT scan revealed a progressive disease (PD); he started treatment with Erlotinib plus ARQ-197/placebo within a clinical trial. As deemed by protocol, molecular analyses were performed on biopsy specimen at time of diagnosis, evidencing exon 21 – point mutation, p.Leu858Arg at EGFR mutational assessment. After 4 cycles, a local progressive disease was described by CT scan and a fibrobronchoscopic re-biopsy was performed in order to define the novel biomolecular profile at that time of the history of the disease. The histological evaluation highlighted a SCLC and molecular analyses confirmed the p.Leu858Arg mutation. Based on new histological diagnosis, he underwent chemotherapy with AUC6 carboplatin on Day 1 every 21 days plus etoposide 100 mg/m2 on Day 1,2,3 every 21 days, for a total of 6 cycles, until May 2012, achieving partial response at CT scan. On August 2012, because of radiological evidence of disease progression, he underwent chemotherapy with Cyclophosphamide 800 mg/m2, Doxorubicine 40mg/m2 and Vincristine 1mg/m2 on Day 1 every 21 days. After 3 cycles, he reported intense swelling in the supraclavicular right fossa and a fine needle aspiration of supraclavicular right lymphadenopathy was performed. The final pathological diagnosis was undifferentiated sarcoma cells (CK-,TTF1-, VIM+) . Patient died, on January 2013, because of worsening of clinical conditions.

      Results
      Not applicable

      Conclusion
      Many studies hypothesize that SCLC either evolved from the previously diagnosed NSCLC or that both arose from a common precursor. Further comparative molecular analysis of these histologically distinct tumors would be of value to better understand the potential role of EGFR in the evolution of lung cancer and the role of selection for an EGFR-mutant SCLC cell subclone as an unusual mechanism of acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors in NSCLC.