Author of

• 12418

  +

  P3.05 - Poster Session 3 - Preclinical Models of Therapeutics/Imaging (ID 159)

  • Event: WCLC 2013
  • Type: Poster Session
  • Track: Biology
  • Presentations: 1
  • Moderators:
  • Coordinates: 10/30/2013, 09:30 - 16:30, Exhibit Hall, Ground Level

  • 12438

    +

    P3.05-021 - Targeting HDACs to overcome cisplatin resistance in malignant plural mesothelioma (ID 3207)

    09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): L. Flynn
    • Abstract

    Background
    Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive cancer of the mesothelial cells and is becoming a worldwide health burden. Progress in the treatment of MPM remains difficult, underscored by the fact that no single treatment option has proven particularly effective and chemo-resistance is a common problem. However, epigenetic modifiers, such as histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDi) have emerged as a novel class of anti-cancer agent and are currently undergoing clinical trials in numerous cancers. There is also evidence to suggest that HDAC expression may play a role in the development of chemo-resistance. We investigated the levels of HDACs in MPM cell lines, patient samples and determined the effect of HDi on MPM cisplatin sensitive and resistant cell lines.

    Methods
    A panel of MPM cell lines (n=16) was screened for the expression of HDAC11, Class I (HDAC1/2/3/8) and Class II (HDAC4/5/6/7/9/10) HDACs at the mRNA level (RT-PCR) and at the protein level (Western Blot). The HDAC expression profile was determined in an isogenic cell line model consisting of a cisplatin sensitive (Parent) and resistant (CisR) MPM cell line, P31. In addition, HDAC expression was examined in panel of twenty patient samples (benign/biphasic/sarcomatoid/epithelial). Also, MPM TMAs were stained by imummo-histochemistry for HDAC5 expression. Furthermore proliferation assays (BrdU ELISA) were performed to determine the effect of two HDi on the p31 cell lines. The HDi used were Vorinostat (pan HDAC inhibitor) and 19i (selective HDAC5 inhibitor).

    Results
    HDAC11, Class I and II HDACs were detected to varying degrees at the mRNA and protein level within our cell line panel. In the P31 isogenic parent/cisplatin resistant, HDAC protein expression was decreased (HDAC2/3/4/5/7) in the CisR compared with the Parent. HDAC5 was significantly reduced at both the protein and the mRNA level (p<0.05). The expression of HDACs 1/2/3/5 were increased in the MPM patient samples (n=15) compared with benign (n=5) (HDAC2/3/5, p<0.05). HDAC5 staining in a cohort of MPM samples, demonstrated no significant association between survival and a low HDAC5 score. However females had a greater median survival than their male counterparts. Vorinostat and 19i significantly reduced the proliferative capacity of the p31 Parent and CisR. SAHA was more effective in the Parent cells compared with CisR. The effect of 19i was similar in both cell lines.

    Conclusion
    Altered HDAC expression was observed in an isogenic Parent and CisR MPM cell model. Work ongoing in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has also demonstrated significantly reduced HDAC5 levels in CisR compared with Parent. This may suggest that a reduction in HDAC expression is involved in cisplatin resistance. Reduced levels of HDAC5, in an MPM TMA, were not associated with survival. It should be noted, however that patient numbers were small and biphasic and sarcomatoid sub-types had the lowest expression levels of HDAC5. We are currently increasing our patient numbers for an additional IHC study. HDi significantly reduced the proliferative capacity of CisR and Parent MPM cells. HDAC levels may represent an important biomarker in stratifying patients for future epigenetic targeted therapies in MPM.