Virtual Library
Start Your Search
J.V. Heymach
Moderator of
-
+
HOD4 - Tuesdays Highlights of the Day - Medical Oncology, Biology, Radiotherapy and Combined Modality (ID 228)
- Event: WCLC 2013
- Type: Highlight of the Day Session
- Track: Biology
- Presentations: 2
- Moderators:J.V. Heymach
- Coordinates: 10/30/2013, 07:00 - 08:00, Bayside Auditorium B, Level 1
-
+
HOD4.1 - Medical Oncology and Biology (ID 4044)
07:00 - 07:20 | Author(s): S.S. Ramalingam
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract not provided
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
HOD4.2 - Radiotherapy and Combined Modality (ID 4045)
07:20 - 07:50 | Author(s): A. Bezjak
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract not provided
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
O15 - NSCLC - Chemotherapy II (ID 109)
- Event: WCLC 2013
- Type: Oral Abstract Session
- Track: Medical Oncology
- Presentations: 8
- Moderators:G. Richardson, J.V. Heymach
- Coordinates: 10/29/2013, 10:30 - 12:00, Bayside Auditorium A, Level 1
-
+
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
The current treatment paradigm for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) includes systemic therapy, radiotherapy or both. A “watch and wait” approach (WW) is commonly used in clinical practice. Whether this approach would have any effect on survival outcomes has not previously been evaluated.Methods
The British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA) provides comprehensive cancer care to a population of 4.5 million across 944735 sq kms. A retrospective review was conducted of all referred patients diagnosed with stage IIIb/IV NSCLC from January to December 2009 in BC who saw a medical oncologist (MO). Patient characteristics, treatment recommendations, and outcomes were abstracted. WW-treated is defined as initial observation with chemotherapy > 8 weeks from MO consult. WW-missed are patients who were on a WW strategy that did not receive chemo. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was compared using log rank test. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to evaluate prognostic factors and control for potential confounders.Results
710 patients were seen by a MO. Median age 66 years (29-90), ECOG 0-1 51%, male 52%, non squamous/squamous/NOS 40%/19%/41%, rural/urban 19%/81%. 327 received upfront chemo, 171 WW and 209 deemed chemo ineligible due to poor ECOG, and comorbidities. Of the 171 patients on a WW approach 44% missed an opportunity for chemotherapy (Figure 1). Reasons for WW-missed included poor ECOG (50%), death (47%), asymptomatic (1%), and illness (1%). Median OS was highest in the WW-treated 16.5 months (CI 12.7-20.3), followed by 13.9 months (CI 12.0-15.8) in the upfront chemo and lowest in the WW-missed 5.9 months (CI 4.4-7.4), p<0.0001. On multivariate analysis, factors predicting a poorer OS included ECOG >2, squamous histology, and a shorter the time from diagnosis to referral and referral to MO consult. When controlled for confounding factors (age, sex, ECOG) OS was similar between the upfront chemo and WW-treated (HR 1.16, CI 0.849-1.58, p=0.353), while those who were in the WW-missed had a significantly lower OS (HR 5.54, CI 3.00-10.24, P<0.0001). Figure 1Conclusion
Our study demonstrates that a “watch and wait” strategy is potentially detrimental to patients because a significant proportion never receives chemotherapy. A decline in ECOG status accounts for 50% of the “missed” chemotherapy. Frequent follow up should be employed for patients who are on a WW approach to ensure the window of opportunity for chemotherapy is not lost.Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
O15.02 - The Spanish Lung Cancer Group (SLCG) BRCA1-RAP80 Expression Customization (BREC) randomized phase III trial of customized chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (NCT00617656/GECP-BREC) (ID 1157)
10:40 - 10:50 | Author(s): R. Rosell, T. Moran, M.A. Cobo Dols, M. Domine, M. Sanchez-Ronco, I. Bover, M. Provencio, B. Massuti, A. Vergnenegre, G. Lopez-Vivanco, G. Robinet, A. Insa, M. Majem, R. De Las Peñas, M.A. Sala, D. Isla, N. Baize, J. Garde, I. Chaib, C. Camps
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
RAP80, a component of the BRCA1 complex, influenced outcome both in p with low BRCA1 expression treated with cisplatin (cis)/gemcitabine (gem) and in p with intermediate/high BRCA1 levels treated with cis/docetaxel (doc) or with doc alone in the SLCG phase II customized chemotherapy trial (NCT00883480). Based on these findings, the SLCG and the French Lung Cancer Group performed a prospective, randomized phase III trial in metastatic NSCLC patients to compare non-customized cis/doc with customized therapy customized according to BRCA1 and RAP80 mRNA expression levels.Methods
From 2008 to 2013, patients with wild-type EGFR were randomized 1:1 to the control or experimental arm. Planned accrual was 391 patients. Treatment in the control arm was cis/doc, while patients in the experimental arm received treatment according to their BRCA1 and RAP80 levels: 1) those with low RAP80, regardless of BRCA1 levels, received cis/gem; 2) those with intermediate/high RAP80 and low/intermediate BRCA1 received cis/doc; and 3) those with intermediate/high RAP80 and high BRCA1 received doc alone. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).Results
At 15 October 2012, 279 patients had been included and the planned interim analysis was performed. PFS was 5.49 months (m) in the control and 4.38 m in the experimental arm (P=0.07). Overall survival (OS) was 12.66 m in the control and 8.52 m in the experimental arm (P=0.006). Response rate (RR) was 37.3% in the control and 27% in the experimental arm (P=0.07). In the multivariate analysis including PS, treatment arm, BRCA1, RAP80, histology, smoking status and metastatic site, only extrathoracic metastases were associated with an increased risk of progression (HR, 1.78; P=0.02). In a post hoc analysis restricted to patients with ECOG PS 0, PFS was 3.91 m in the control and 7.47 m in the experimental arm (P=0.01) for those with low RAP80 levels (experimental group 1). PFS for patients in experimental groups 1, 2 and 3 was 7.47, 7.01 and 3.22 m, respectively (P=0.02). OS for patients in experimental groups 1, 2 and 3 was 28.88, 15.86 and 11.81 m, respectively (P=0.04).Conclusion
Based on the negative results for PFS at the interim analysis, accrual was closed on this study. The negative results may be due to the poor predictive capacity of RAP80 and/or to the inclusion of doc alone as a treatment in the experimental arm. In addition, doc/cis may not have been the ideal combination for the control arm. Customized chemotherapy could be further encouraged in oncogene-driven pan-negative patients with PS 0.Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
O15.03 - Phase III, randomized, multicenter study comparing in elderly patients (≥70 years) with stage IV non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) a standard strategy of treatment allocation (carboplatin based bi-therapy or monotherapy with docetaxel) based on performance status (PS) and age with an experimental strategy allocating the same chemotherapies or best supportive care (BSC) according to a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) - Study ESOGIA-GFPC-GECP 08-02. (ID 694)
10:50 - 11:00 | Author(s): R. Corre, C. Chouaid, L. Greillier, H. Le Caer, C. Audigier-Valette, N. Baize, H. Berard, L. Falchero, I. Monnet, E. Dansin, A. Vergnenegre, M. Marcq, C. Decroistte, S. Bota, R. Lamy, B. Massuti, C. Dujon, G. Fraboulet, J. Minguet, C. Plassot, H. Lena
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
Incidence of advanced NSCLC in the elderly is increasing. The use of a CGA is recommended to detect the patient’s vulnerability but its integration in treatment decision making has never been prospectively evaluated. The main objective of this study was to show that, compared to a standard strategy based on PS and age, the use of a CGA can improve the management of NSCLC in first line.Methods
Randomized, multicentric, prospective phase III study in patients ≥70 y, PS 0-2 with stage IV NSCLC. We compared in arm A a standard algorithm of chemotherapy allocation based on PS and age: carboplatin based doublet in PS≤1 and age ≤75y, mono-therapy in PS =2 or age >75y with in arm B an experimental strategy of treatment allocation based on CGA: carboplatin based doublet for fit patients, mono-therapy for vulnerable patients and BSC for frail patients. Carboplatin (AUC5,d1), was associated to pemetrexed (500 mg/m2,d1) in non-squamous tumors and to gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2, d1-8) in squamous tumors, monotherapy was docetaxel 38 mg/m2 (d1-8). Four cycles of chemotherapy were to be given every three weeks. The main endpoint was time to failure treatment (TTF=duration between the date of randomization and the date the patient was withdrawn from treatment for any reason (progression, toxicity, death), secondary endpoints were Overall Response Rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), toxicity and quality of life (QoL), survival adjusted on QoL .Results
493 patients were randomized from 01/2010 to 01/2013 by 45 centers. Patients characteristics were: male: 74%, median age: 77 (70-91) years, non-squamous histology: 71.8%, PS 0-1: 81.4%, ADL<6:13.9%, IADL<4:27.5%, Charlson’s index ≥2: 23%, score GDS 5≥3:2.5%. The 2 arms were well-balanced for patients characteristics except for ADL<6 (17.4% in arm A vs 10.3% in arm B). Respectively in arms A and B, 34.4% and 47% patients received a carboplatin based doublet, 65.6% and 31.5% received docetaxel and in arm B 21.5% received BSC. There was no significant difference in terms of TTF, respectively for arm A and arm B: median TTF was 99 days (d), 95%CI:[89; 126] vs. 98 d, 95%CI:[81;135], p=0.7149 and in terms of mOS: 196 d in arm A, 95%CI [171;231] vs. 185 d in arm B ,95%CI [148;235], p=0.7784. All grades toxicities were significantly less frequent in arm B than in arm A (93% vs.86.2%, p=0.016), but there was no difference in terms of grade 3-4 toxicities. All the secondary endpoints data will be updated at time of the meeting.Conclusion
this large phase III study failed to show a superiority of a CGA based strategy of treatment allocation in terms of TTF. In experimental arm, 21.5% of frail patients according to Balducci’s criteria were enrolled and received an exclusive BSC management. Carboplatin-based doublets with pemetrexed and gemcitabine according to histology are feasible with a good profile of tolerance in selected elderly patients. This study will help to precise the most relevant geriatric tools and their cut-off in order to improve the management of the elderly with advanced NSCLC.Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
O15.04 - DISCUSSANT (ID 3940)
11:00 - 11:15 | Author(s): R. Lilenbaum
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract not provided
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
O15.05 - Randomized Phase III Trial of S-1 plus Cisplatin versus Docetaxel plus Cisplatin for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (TCOG0701): Subgroup Analysis. (ID 1895)
11:15 - 11:25 | Author(s): O. Ishimoto, A. Gemma, H. Sakai, N. Katakami, K. Kubota, M. Nishio, A. Inoue, H. Okamoto, H. Isobe, H. Kunitoh, Y. Takiguchi, K. Kobayashi, Y. Nakamura, H. Ohmatsu, K. Minato, M. Fukuda, A. Yokoyama, M. Takeuchi, H. Michimae, S. Kudoh
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
Docetaxel plus cisplatin (DP) is the only third-generation regimen that has demonstrated statistically significant improvements in overall survival and QOL by head-to-head comparison with a second-generation regimen (vindesine plus cisplatin) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) has shown activity and good tolerability in phase II settings. Molecularly targeted agents including bevacizumab (BEV) have shown activity and safety in non-squamous (non-Sq) NSCLC.Methods
Patients with previously untreated stage IIIB or IV NSCLC, an ECOG PS of 0-1 and adequate organ functions were randomly assigned to receive either oral S-1 80 mg/m[2]/day (40 mg/m[2] b.i.d.) on days 1 to 21 plus cisplatin 60 mg/m[2] on day 8 every 5 weeks or docetaxel 60 mg/m[2 ]on day 1 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m[2] on day 1 every 3 weeks, both up to 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). A non-inferiority study design was employed; the upper confidence interval (CI) limit of the hazard ratio (HR) was <1.322. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), response, safety, and QOL. Subgroup analysis by histology (non-Sq vs Sq) was conducted.Results
From April 2007 through December 2008, 608 patients were randomly assigned to SP (n=303) or DP (n=305) at 66 sites in Japan. Patient demographics were well balanced between the two groups. Non-Sq and Sq patients in SP/DP arm was 251/247 and 50/48 respectively. Two interim analyses were preplanned. At the final analysis, a total of 480 deaths had occurred. The primary endpoint was met. OS in the SP arm was non-inferior to that in the DP arm (median survival, 16.1 vs. 17.1 months, respectively; HR=1.013; 96.4% confidence interval, 0.837-1.227). PFS was 4.9 months in the SP arm and 5.2 months in the DP arm. The rates of febrile neutropenia (7.4% vs. 1.0%), grade 3/4 neutropenia (73.4% vs. 22.9%), grade 3/4 infection (14.5% vs. 5.3%), and grade 1/2 alopecia (59.3% vs. 12.3%) were significantly lower in the SP arm than in the DP arm. In terms of physical functioning and global functioning on the EORTC QLQ-C30 and lung cancer module (LC-13), QOL was better in the SP arm (repeated measures ANOVA: p<0.01). Subgroup analysis by histology revealed that the median OS of non-Sq and Sq patients in SP/DP group was 17.4/19.1 months and 12.3/11.7 months respectively, of which hazard ratio was 0.973 (95% CI, 0.797-1.187) and 1.239 (95% CI, 0.819-1.874). Interaction P value was 0.3004.Conclusion
S-1 plus cisplatin is a standard first-line chemotherapeutic regimen for advanced NSCLC both non-Sq and Sq histology. Favorable toxicity profile of the SP regimen and encouraging outcome in patients with non-Sq prompted us to conduct a prospective study of SP plus BEV and maintenance S-1 BEV for non-SQ currently underway.Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
O15.06 - Randomized Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine (G)/Carboplatin (C) with or without Iniparib (I) in Patients (Pts) with Previously Untreated Stage IV Squamous Lung Cancer (ID 3322)
11:25 - 11:35 | Author(s): D. Spigel, E.S. Kim, T. Lynch, M. McCleod, D. Waterhouse, L. Paz-Ares, P. Harper, J. Hainsworth, F. De Marinis, F. Kabbinavar, R. Rosell, M.A. Socinski, A. Vergnenegre, I. Garcia-Ribas, H. Burris, F.A. Shepherd
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
Iniparib is an agent originally thought to function as an inhibitor of the DNA repair enzyme PARP-1, which is overexpressed in squamous lung cancers. Promising phase II activity and safety were reported with iniparib in combination with GC in pts with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (O’Shaughnessy, NEJM 2011); however, subsequent phase III data were negative. Further study of iniparib’s mechanism of action suggests that this agent induces DNA damage, cell cycle arrest in the G2/M phase, and potentiates DNA-damaging chemotherapies not through PARP inhibition. Herein we report the final results from an international Phase III trial (NCT01082549) of first-line chemotherapy and iniparib in pts with advanced squamous lung cancer.Methods
Pts were randomized 1:1 to GC or GCI. All pts received G 1000 mg/m[2] IV days (D) 1 and 8, and C AUC=5 IV D1 of each 21-D cycle. Iniparib was dosed 5.6 mg/kg IV D 1, 4, 8, and 11. All pts were assessed for response per RECIST 1.1 every 6 weeks. Pts without evidence of progressive disease (PD) or other reason for discontinuation could remain on treatment beyond 6 cycles. Accrual of 780 pts provides 89% power to detect an improvement in survival from 8 months (mos) anticipated with GC to 10.7 mos with GCI (HR of 0.75). Eligibility: Pts with newly diagnosed stage IV (M1a and M1b) squamous lung cancer, ECOG PS 0-1. Exclusion criteria included: history of recent cardiac disease, untreated brain metastases, and treatment for early-stage lung cancer within 12 months of study entry. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Interim analyses for safety and futility were performed by an independent data safety monitoring board.Results
780 pts were enrolled and randomized (GC, 390), (GCI, 390) from March 2010 to May 2012. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups (GC/GCI): median age 66 years (21-86); 74%/73% male; 30%/33% ECOG 0; 28%/33% current smokers; 66%/62% past smokers. The median number of cycles for GC/GCI were 4 (1-26)/5 (1-32). Dose reductions, dose intensity, and discontinuations due to tumor progression or adverse events were similar in both arms. The median OS for GC/GCI was 8.9 v. 8.9 months, HR 1.08 (0.92-1.28), p=.348. 1-year OS was 41 v. 40%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for GC vs GCI was 4.9 v. 4.8 months, HR 0.99 (0.83-1.19), p=.92. The objective response rate (ORR) for GC v GCI was 34 v. 32%, p=.648. The safety profile was similar in both arms; anemia (28/26%), neutropenia (31/35%), thrombocytopenia (27/28%), and fatigue (6/9%).Conclusion
The addition of iniparib did not improve the efficacy of GC in the treatment of pts with advanced squamous lung cancer. Further development of iniparib in squamous lung cancer is not recommended.Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
O15.07 - Final results of CTONG 0806: a phase II trial comparing pemetrexed with gefitinib as second-line treatment of advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients with wild-type EGFR (ID 1920)
11:35 - 11:45 | Author(s): Q. Zhou, Y. Cheng, M. Zhao, J. Yang, H. Yan, L. Zhang, Y. Song, J. Chen, W. Feng, C. Xu, Y. Wu, C.T.O.G. (ctong)
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
Both Pemetrexed and gefitinib are standard second-line treatments for advanced non-squamous NSCLC in East Asia. The CTONG 0806, a multi-center, randomized, controlled, open-label phase II trial was designed to explore the efficacy of pemetrexed versus gefitinib as second-line treatment in advanced non-squamous NSCLC with wild-type EGFR.Methods
Patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous NSCLC previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and with wild-type EGFR detected by direct sequencing were randomized to receive gefitinib orally 250 mg/day (G arm) or pemetrexed 500 mg/m[2] iv day 1 every 21 days (P arm) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included 4-month and 6-month PFS rate, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), quality of life and safety. Independent Review Committee (IRC) evaluated all pictorial data.Results
From Feb. 2009 to Aug. 2012, 161 patients were enrolled and 157 were evaluable (81 in G arm and 76 in P arm). Baseline characteristics were balanced between arms. The primary endpoint of median PFS was met with 4.8 months in P arm versus 1.6 months in G arm（HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.40~0.75, P<0.001), which was confirmed by IRC evaluation (5.6 vs. 1.7 months, HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.38~0.75, P<0.001). Significant difference between two arms was also seen in terms of 4-month PFS rate, 6-month PFS rate and DCR (Table 1). Median OS showed the trend of superiority in P arm (12.4 vs. 9.6 months, HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.49 ~ 1.04, P=0.077). In 108 patients having enough tumor tissue, EGFR mutation status was tested again by Scorpion amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) and 32 were found to be positive. In 76 patients with wild-type EGFR confirmed by ARMS (35 in P arm and 41 in G arm), median PFS was 4.0 vs. 1.3 months (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.26~0.67, P<0.001). More skin rash and diarrhea were seen in G arm while more fatigue and ALT increase were in P arm. CTCAE grade 3 or 4 adverse events was 12.3% in G arm and 32.9% in P arm (P=0.002). The detailed survival analysis and biomarkers analysis will be presented on the ground.Table1. Efficacy of pemetrexed and gefitinib evaluated by investigators and IRC
Evaluated by Investigators Evaluated by IRC Pemetrexed arm Gefitinib arm P Pemetrexed Gefitinib arm P PFS 4.8months 1.6months <0.001 5.6months 1.7months <0.001 HR 0.54，95% CI 0.40 ~ 0.75 HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.38 ~ 0.75 4-month PFS rate 59.0% 33.0% <0.001 62.0% 37.0% <0.001 6-month PFS rate 43.0% 23.0% <0.001 48.0% 27.0% <0.001 ORR 13.2% 13.6% 0.938 14.5% 12.3% 0.695 DCR 60.5% 29.6% <0.001 61.9% 30.8% <0.001 OS 12.4months 9.6months 0.077 HR 0.72，95% CI 0.49 ~ 1.04 Conclusion
CTONG0806 is the first trial to show significant improvement in PFS, DCR and a trend of improving OS with pemetrexed compared with gefitinib in second-line setting for EGFR wild-type advanced non-squamous NSCLC.Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
O15.08 - DISCUSSANT (ID 3941)
11:45 - 12:00 | Author(s): J.S. Lee
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract not provided
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
Author of
-
+
MO15 - Novel Genes and Pathways (ID 89)
- Event: WCLC 2013
- Type: Mini Oral Abstract Session
- Track: Biology
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:Y. Ohe, G. Reid
- Coordinates: 10/29/2013, 16:15 - 17:45, Parkside Ballroom A, Level 1
-
+
MO15.08 - KDR (VEGFR-2) copy number gains and mutations are targetable alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (ID 1466)
17:00 - 17:05 | Author(s): J.V. Heymach
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
Therapeutic regimens targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway have been extensively tested in the treatment of malignancies including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). VEGF pathway inhibitors including bevacizumab or VEGF receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been shown to prolong progression-free survival (PFS) and/or overall survival (OS). These benefits, however, have been modest, occurring only in subsets of patients. Therefore, predictive markers to identify patients likely to derive benefit are critically needed. Although expression of VEGFR-2, also known as KDR, was initially thought to localize primarily on endothelial cells, VEGFR-2 has been detected on malignant cells. We recently observed that KDR copy number gains (CNGs) were detectable by FISH in ~30% of both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma and were associated with poor clinical outcome in early stage NSCLC patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. In addition to CNGs, mutations and polymorphisms within the KDR gene were also observed. The impact of these alterations is unknown. Here, we investigated KDR CNGs, polymorphisms, and mutations in NSCLC and their effects on sensitivity to VEGFR targeting agents in preclinical models and in NSCLC patients.Methods
Cell migration was evaluated by Boyden chamber assay. NSCLC cell lines were treated with VEGF pathway inhibitors for 24 hours, and protein lysates where collected. HIF-1α levels were evaluated by ELISA assay. VEGFR, p38, and p70s6K were evaluated by Western blotting. Tumor DNA and peripheral blood DNA, were analyzed in duplicate using Affymetrix Genome-Wide SNP Array 6.0. Transformation of Ba/F3 cells was evaluated by an IL-3-independent growth assay.Results
In tumor cells with KDR CNG, VEGF stimulation induced activation of p38 and p70S6K, and VEGFR TKIs including sorafenib and vandetanib effectively inhibited VEGF-mediated signal transduction. In tumor cell lines with KDR CNG, exogenous VEGF ligand increased cell motility and this was inhibited by VEGFR blockade with TKIs including sunitinib, sorafenib, and axitinib. Various receptor tyrosine kinases have been shown to drive HIF-1α levels, and NSCLC cells with KDR CNG express elevated levels of HIF-1α in normoxia compared to NSCLC cell lines without KDR CNG. In NSCLC cell lines with KDR CNG, VEGFR TKIs decreased protein levels of HIF-1α and HIF-1α regulated proteins. Furthermore, we report a clinical case in which a NSCLC patient with KDR CNG had a partial response to the VEGFR inhibitor, sorafenib. In addition to gene amplification, mutations and polymorphisms within the KDR gene were also observed. KDR mutation 1586A>T and polymorphism 1416A>T effectively transformed Ba/F3 cells. Finally, we report two clinical cases in which NSCLC patients with the 1416A>T polymorphism had a partial response the VEGF pathway inhibitor, bevacizumab.Conclusion
Collectively, our data indicate that KDR amplification promotes downstream signaling events including activation of the p38, mTOR, and HIF pathways and are targetable by VEGF pathway inhibitors. KDR gene alterations may be predictive markers for VEGF pathway inhibitors.Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
MO18 - NSCLC - Targeted Therapies IV (ID 116)
- Event: WCLC 2013
- Type: Mini Oral Abstract Session
- Track: Medical Oncology
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:L. Horn, J. Wolf
- Coordinates: 10/29/2013, 16:15 - 17:45, Bayside Auditorium B, Level 1
-
+
MO18.06 - BATTLE-2 Program: A Biomarker-Integrated Targeted Therapy Study in Previously Treated Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) (ID 1949)
16:45 - 16:50 | Author(s): J.V. Heymach
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
Effective therapeutic strategies for mutant KRAS and other biomarkers of resistance in refractory NSCLC remain an unmet medical need, while a personalized medicine approach is increasingly adopted in NSCLC guided by tumor molecular profiling. The BATTLE-2 clinical study is using EGFR, PI3K/AKT and MEK inhibitors and is designed to identify biomarkers for optimal patient selection for these therapies (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01248247).Methods
This is a four-arm, open-label, multi-center, biopsy-driven, adaptive randomization, phase II clinical trial in NSCLC pts that failed at least 1 prior line of therapy. Patients are adaptively randomized to 4 arms: erlotinib, erlotinib plus the AKT inhibitor MK-2206, MK-2206 plus the MEK inhibitor selumetinib, and sorafenib. The primary objective is 8-week disease control rate (DCR). The trial is conducted in 2 stages. In Stage 1, 200 evaluable pts are adaptively randomized (AR) based on observed 8-week DCR and KRAS mutation status while predictive biomarkers are being developed by means of gene expression profiling, targeted next generation sequencing and protein expression. EGFR sensitizing mutations and EML4/ALK translocation in pts that are erlotinib and crizotinib naïve are exclusion criteria, while erlotinib resistant patients are excluded from erlotinib monotherapy. In Stage 2, the AR model is refined to include the most predictive biomarkers tested in Stage 1, with subsequent Stage 2 AR based on the new algorithm, to a total of 400 evaluable pts. Selection of Stage 2 single and/or composite markers follows a rigorous, internally and externally reviewed statistical analysis that follows a training, testing methodology with validation in stage 2 of the trial. All Stage 1 and 2 randomization biomarker assays are CLIA-certified.Results
286 pts have been enrolled, 236 biopsies performed,172 pts randomized, and 167 pts treated. 144 pts are evaluable for the 8-week DCR endpoint. Within the randomized pts group KRAS mutation rate is 22.8%, and EGFR mutation rate 14.8%, while 36.3% patients have been previously treated with erlotinib. Treatment is well tolerated with no unanticipated toxicity.Conclusion
Accrual updates, demographics, and further details will be presented at the meeting. (Supported by NCI R01CA155196-01A1)Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
MO20 - Preclinical Therapeutic Models II (ID 93)
- Event: WCLC 2013
- Type: Mini Oral Abstract Session
- Track: Biology
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:P. Waring, M. Kohonen-Corish
- Coordinates: 10/30/2013, 10:30 - 12:00, Bayside Gallery B, Level 1
-
+
MO20.02 - Proteomic analysis identifies baseline PI3K/Akt pathway activation and treatment-induced supppression of mTOR signaling as determinants of response to MEK inhibition (ID 2845)
10:35 - 10:40 | Author(s): J.V. Heymach
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
Inhibition of MEK is a promising treatment strategy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MEK inhibitors are being investigated for KRAS mutant disease, but KRAS alone is not predictive of efficacy, and other predictors of response and resistance are not known. The downstream effects of MEK inhibition have not been fully described. Here, we report broad proteomic analysis of NSCLC cell lines before and after treatment with MEK inhibitor BAY86-9766.Methods
We treated 109 NSCLC cell lines with BAY86-9766. Drug sensitivity was determined by CellTiter-Glo assay and cell lines were classified as sensitive or resistant based on whether their IC50 values were in the highest or lowest 1/3[rd] of those tested. Proteomic analysis for regular and phospho-proteins was performed by reverse phase protein array. Using paired t-tests, we compared pre- versus post-treatment protein levels in the overall group and between the sensitive vs. resistant cell lines.Results
Increased activation of the PI3 kinase pathway at baseline correlated with resistance to MEK inhibition, with resistant cell lines showing higher baseline levels of pAkt (S437), pAkt (T308), pPDK1, and p4E-BP1 (S65), and lower baseline levels of PTEN (all p<0.05). Cell lines with increased MEK phosphorylation at baseline were more sensitive to MEK inhibition (p=0.048). BAY86-9766 was very effective at reducing pERK (p=1.65x10[-35]) but this modulation was not significantly different between sensitive and resistant cell lines (p=0.64). Increased phosphorylation of MEK was seen with treatment (1.66x10[-16]). mTOR signaling was suppressed by MEK inhibition, with decreased phospho-p70S6K, pS6 (S235/236), and pS6 (S240/S244) and increased eIF4E following treatment (all p<0.02). These effects were significantly more pronounced in sensitive vs resistant cell lines (all p<0.01). Higher levels of LKB1 total protein, pAMPK, and pTSC2 were also seen following treatment (all p<0.02).Conclusion
We have performed broad proteomic analysis of NSCLC cell lines treated with MEK inhibitor BAY86-9766. Baseline activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway predicts for resistance to MEK inhibition. Sensitive cell lines, but not resistant cell lines, show suppression of mTOR activity with treatment with BAY86-9766. The effects of MEK inhibition of mTOR may be modulated by p90RSK through an LKB1 dependent pathway. This suggests a basis for combining targeted agents to overcome resistance, such as combinations of MEK inhibitors with PI3K inhibitors or mTOR inhibitors.Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
