Virtual Library

 x 
My Library Virtual Library FAQ

Start Your Search

Y. Namba



Author of

  • +

    P2.10 - Poster Session 2 - Chemotherapy (ID 207)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P2.10-014 - A phase II study of bevacizumab in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with non-squamous (Non-Sq) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring Mutations of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) gene after failing First-line EGFR-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) Hanshin Oncology Group 0109 (ID 1054)

      09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): Y. Namba

      • Abstract

      Background
      EGFR-TKIs’ mono-therapy is one of the standard 1[st] line therapy for NSCLC harboring EGFR gene mutations. Although platinum doublet ± bevacizumab recommended for 2nd line therapy after failing EGFR-TKIs in National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline, there is little information of these setting. Therefore, we planned prospective phaseⅡ study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel(PCB) for EGFR-TKIs resistant Non-Sq NSCLC.

      Methods
      In multicenter phase II trial, we recruited non-squamous NSCLC harboring EGFR gene mutation after failing EGFR-TKIs. Key eligibility criteria were as follows: Non-Sq NSCLC with EGFR mutation, failure of 1[st] line EGFR-TKIs, stageIIIB or IV or recurrence after surgery, measurable lesion, age 20 or over, ECOG Performance status (PS) 0 or 1, adequate organ function. Clinically significant hemoptysis, symptomatic brain metastasis, uncontrollable hypertension, interstitial pneumonia were excluded. Patients received carboplatin (AUC=6/5), paclitaxel (200mg/m2), bevacizumab (15mg/kg) intravenously on day1 every 3 weeks for three to six cycles, and bevacizumab was administered every 3 weeks until disease progression or intolerable toxic effects. Primary endpoint was response rate (RR) and secondary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR) and safety.

      Results
      A total of 31 patients were assigned between March 2010 and February 2013. One patient was excluded because of unfitted eligibility criteria. Therefore, we analyzed thirty patients’ data. Median age was 60 years (45~74), male/female : 11/19, PS 0/1 : 9/21, non-smoker/smoker : 18/12, EGFR mutation status exon19 del/exon21 L858R : 20/11, 1[st] line EGFR-TKIs gefitinib/erlotinib/other : 22/7/1. RR : 40% (95%CI:22%-58%), DCR : 83% (95%CI:70%-97%), PFS : 6.0 month (95%CI:4.8-12.2). Major severe adverse event (Grade 3,4) were one patient with dyspnea (G4), 6 with fever neutropenia (G3) and 3 patients with hyper tension (G3). There was no grade 5 adverse event.

      Conclusion
      In patients with Non-Sq NSCLC harboring EGFR gene mutation failed 1[st] line EGFR-TKIs, RR of 2[nd] line PCB therapy was lower than it was in 1[st ]line phase II study of PCB in Japan, but same RR of E4599 study. Safety was similar to previous reports. We considered PCB therapy is one of the treatment option in 2[nd]-line for patient with EGFR-TKIs resistant Non-Sq NSCLC.

  • +

    P3.10 - Poster Session 3 - Chemotherapy (ID 210)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P3.10-019 - Oral S-1 and carboplatin followed by maintenance S-1 for chemo-naive patients with advanced squamous cell lung cancer (OSAKA-LCSG 1102) (ID 1384)

      09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): Y. Namba

      • Abstract

      Background
      The subset analysis of LETS study suggested that S-1 plus carboplatin was more beneficial than paclitaxel plus carboplatin in overall survival (OS) in squamous cell lung cancer. We previously showed the validity of tailored dose S-1 adjusted by BSA and Ccr. No maintenance study focusing on squamous cell lung cancer has been reported yet. Here, we conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tailored dose S-1 plus carboplatin followed by S-1 maintenance in chemonaïve patients with advanced and recurrent squamous cell lung cancer.

      Methods
      Patients receive carboplatin (AUC = 5, day1) plus S-1 (tailored dose b.i.d., days 1-14) every 21 days. Non-progressive patients after 4 cycles of induction continued to receive S-1 until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) with a threshold value of 15%. The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and OS from enrollment, PFS in maintenance phase, and safety.

      Results
      Between April 2011 and October 2012, 35 patients were enrolled. Thirty-three patients excluding 2 patients with protocol violations were analyzed. The median age was 72 years (range, 44-82), The ORR was 30.3% (95% CI: 15.6-48.7%) that met the primary endpoint. Disease control rate was 75.8%, and 10 patients (30.3%) received maintenance therapy. The median PFS was 3.7 months. The median OS and maintenance PFS are under follow-up. 10 patients received maintenance S-1 (median: 3 cycles, range: 1-9 cycles); median PFS from the beginning of induction treatment was 5.6 months. Grade 3/4 toxicities with the frequency more than 5% included 4 neutropenia (12.1%), 7 thrombocytopenia (21.2%), 2 anemia (6.1%), 4 appetite loss (12.1%), 2 nausea (6.1%) and 2 fatigue (6.1%). All of them were controllable and febrile neutropenia was not experienced.

      Conclusion
      This is the first trial of S-1 plus carboplatin followed by maintenance S-1 for chemo-naïve advanced and recurrent squamous cell lung cancer. This treatment strategy was effective and feasible.