Author of

• 11515

  +

  P2.05 - Poster Session 2 - Preclinical Models of Therapeutics/Imaging (ID 158)

  • Event: WCLC 2013
  • Type: Poster Session
  • Track: Biology
  • Presentations: 1
  • Moderators:
  • Coordinates: 10/29/2013, 09:30 - 16:30, Exhibit Hall, Ground Level

  • 11536

    +

    P2.05-021 - Molecular analysis of asbestos-induced mesotheliomas from SV40 TAg transgenic mice shows that they are highly concordant with human mesothelioma (ID 3211)

    09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): B. Robinson
    • Abstract

    Background
    Asbestos-induced mesothelioma in MexTAg transgenic mice closely resembles the key features of human disease. This model is highly suited to testing new chemotherapies and cancer prevention strategies. The resultant mesothelioma responds to cytotoxic chemotherapy with efficacy of the same order of responsiveness as human mesothelioma. The transgene, large T Antigen is an oncogene encoded by Simian Virus 40, and the role of this viral oncogene in tumourigenesis has been widely studied. Here we investigate the gene expression differences between TAg tumours and wild type tumours and examine overall similarity to human mesothelioma at the molecular level.

    Methods
    not applicable

    Results
    We found TAg expressing mouse tumours were 90% identical to wild type mouse tumours. The key pathway that was affected by these gene differences was cell cycle. Gene set enrichment analysis showed that the TAg:wild type tumour differences were homolgous to the Rb null genotype in a TAg dose dependent manner. To address whether transgenic mouse tumours were a good representation of human mesothelioma when compared to wild type mouse tumours, we showed that of genes differentially expressed between i) TAg or ii) wild type mouse tumours and mouse mesothelial cells, there were the same number of gene similarities with the set of genes that differentiate between human mesothelioma and human mesothelial cells. Human mesotheliomas commonly have a deletion of the cdkN2 locus, encoding the tumour suppressor genes p16 and p15. We found that while wild type mouse tumours contained the p16 deletion, TAg tumours did not.

    Conclusion
    In summary, the asbestos-induced mesotheliomas in MexTAg mice are comparable to human mesothelioma at the molecular level. We hypothesize that TAg expressing mice develop tumours in a more uniform way than wild type mice following asbestos exposure and are not dependent on deletion of p16 for tumourigenesis.