Author of

• 10801

  +

  P1.11 - Poster Session 1 - NSCLC Novel Therapies (ID 208)

  • Event: WCLC 2013
  • Type: Poster Session
  • Track: Medical Oncology
  • Presentations: 1
  • Moderators:
  • Coordinates: 10/28/2013, 09:30 - 16:30, Exhibit Hall, Ground Level

  • 10841

    +

    P1.11-041 - Overall survival of ALK translocation - and of EGFR mutation positive NSCLC patients treated with and without personalized therapy. A retrospective analysis within the Network Genomic Medicine (ID 2916)

    09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): K. Kambartel
    • Abstract

    Background
    Erlotinib, Gefitinib and Crizotinib have been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the treatment of molecular defined patient subgroups with advanced EGFR mutation positive (EGFR M+) and ALK translocation positive (ALK +) NSCLC, respectively. In randomized clinical trials for ALK + and EGFR M+ patients comparing standard chemotherapy to TKI treatment so far no significant improvement in overall survival (OS) could be shown, based on the high crossover rate of patients initially treated in the standard chemotherapy arm into the TKI arms upon progression. Since prevention of crossover is obsolete due to ethical reasons, registry data may gain in importance for investigating the impact of new effective targeted drugs on OS in the near future.

    Methods
    Since January 2010 EGFR sequencing and ALK FISH analysis for lung adenocarcinoma was performed within the Network Genomic Medicine (NGM) as part of a broad genetic screening effort. This included mutation screening for EGFR, KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA as well as HER2 amplification and recently also translocations of RET and ROS. Clinical and follow-up data were extracted from medical records, directly collected from physicians and patients and additionally matched with data of the Epidemiological Cancer registry of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.

    Results
    So far, we included a total of 44 ALK+ and 143 EGFR M+ patients into our analysis. The median age of the ALK + and EGFR M+patients was 53.5 yrs and 71 yrs, respectively. 39% of the ALK+ patients received crizotinib and 54% of the EGFR M+ patients received an EGFR TKI during the course of their disease. The median OS (mOS) of patients with an initial stage IIIb/IV was 14 months (95% CI 6.2 - 21.8) for ALK+ and 29 months (95% CI 16 - 41) for EGFR M+ patients. Both groups showed a significant difference in mOS when separated by targeted treatment status. ALK+ patients who received crizotinib had a mOS of 23 months (95% CI 12.2 - 33.8) and patients who did not receive crizotinib had a mOS of 8 months (95% CI 0.0 - 17.4) (p = 0.01). EGFR M+ patients who received an EGFR TKI had a mOS of 31 months (95% CI not computable) and patients who did not receive an EGFR TKI had a mOS of 9 months (95% CI 4.9 - 13.1) (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences with regard to treatment of a platinum-containing chemotherapy, age or sex between the two groups.

    Conclusion
    Screening patients for genetic driver mutations identified patients with EGFR mutations and ALK translocations that were not treated with a kinase inhibitor. Comparing these cohorts of patients that only received standard chemotherapy to those subsequently treated with a personalized approach showed a significant improvement in OS. This confirms the predictive value of ALK translocations and EGFR mutations for treatment with the respective TKIs